[RHACS] [Docs] [rhacs-docs-main] ROX-33164: Fixing DITA errors in cli/command-reference/roxctl-sensor.adoc#111791
Conversation
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-33164 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
🤖 Mon Jul 20 12:52:03 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://111791--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/cli/command-reference/roxctl-sensor.html |
📋 PR SummaryType: DITA Modular Refactoring for CLI Reference This PR refactors ✅ What Was DoneAssembly Refactoring
Module Splitting
DITA Compliance
Content Quality
📂 Module Hierarchy🧪 Review GuideMain Assembly📄 Preview: https://111791--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/cli/command-reference/roxctl-sensor.html Check:
Command Sectionsroxctl sensor generate (with subcommands)Location: Scroll to "roxctl sensor generate" heading in the preview Verify:
Modules:
roxctl sensor generate k8s (subcommand)Location: Nested under "roxctl sensor generate" as H3 heading Verify:
Modules (leveloffset=+3):
roxctl sensor generate openshift (subcommand)Location: Nested under "roxctl sensor generate" as H3 heading Verify:
Modules (leveloffset=+3):
roxctl sensor get-bundleLocation: Scroll to "roxctl sensor get-bundle" heading Verify:
Modules:
roxctl sensor generate-certsLocation: Scroll to "roxctl sensor generate-certs" heading Verify:
Modules:
📊 Stats
🎯 Key Features3-Level HierarchyThis PR implements a 3-level command hierarchy:
The subcommands use leveloffset=+3 for their usage/options modules. Assembly-Level OptionsIncludes assembly-level options that apply to all subcommands:
Parameter DocumentationUsage modules include parameter descriptions:
🔗 Related PRsThis PR follows the same modular refactoring pattern as:
All implement Red Hat modular documentation standards for CLI reference assemblies with DITA compliance. ✅ Ready for ReviewThis PR is ready for review and merge. All content has been preserved, DITA compliance achieved, and build checks passed. Special attention:
|
jlprevatt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM except for the 2 comments; both of the comments are about stuff that might confuse users.
ROX33164 Apply review comments
3f55146 to
53e560e
Compare
|
@agantony: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.11 |
|
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.10 |
|
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.9 |
|
@agantony: new pull request created: #115793 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@agantony: new pull request created: #115794 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@agantony: new pull request created: #115795 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Version(s):
4.9+
Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/ROX-33164
Link to docs preview:
SME review: NA
Additional information:
rhacs-docs-4.10rhacs-docs-4.9