Skip to content

OSDOCS#18988: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file#108999

Open
bergerhoffer wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-17637-storage
Open

OSDOCS#18988: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file#108999
bergerhoffer wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-17637-storage

Conversation

@bergerhoffer

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented Mar 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-18988

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A - CQA work, just moving text around, no new technical info

Additional information:

  • Since this is resolving an index.adoc navigation file, xrefs are allowed in the resulting reference modules. These reference modules must only ever be included in one location
  • Content was copied from the assembly to the modules without any changes other than the abstract lines.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 25, 2026
Comment thread modules/csi.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/dynamic-provisioning.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/storage-types.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/storage-types.adoc Outdated
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer changed the title OSDOCS#17637: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file [WIP] [POC] OSDOCS#17637: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file Mar 25, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 25, 2026
@bergerhoffer
bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-17637-storage branch from 53d9af3 to 1012906 Compare March 25, 2026 18:30
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer changed the title [WIP] [POC] OSDOCS#17637: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file [WIP] [POC] OSDOCS#18988: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file Apr 8, 2026
@bergerhoffer
bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-17637-storage branch from 1012906 to 07d4b11 Compare April 8, 2026 15:48
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer changed the title [WIP] [POC] OSDOCS#18988: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file OSDOCS#18988: Updating the storage index.adoc navigation file Apr 8, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 8, 2026
@bergerhoffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Apr 8, 2026
@lahinson lahinson added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 8, 2026
@lahinson lahinson added this to the Continuous Release milestone Apr 8, 2026

@lahinson lahinson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bergerhoffer Looks good! I spotted two things that you might want to address, but nothing that would block merging.

Comment thread modules/csi.adoc
Comment thread modules/dynamic-provisioning.adoc Outdated
@lahinson lahinson added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 8, 2026
@bergerhoffer
bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-17637-storage branch from 07d4b11 to b56e614 Compare May 4, 2026 16:32
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bergerhoffer: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jeana-redhat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The branch/enterprise-5.0 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for branch/enterprise-4.22. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (branch/enterprise-5.0).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 5.0 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate enterprise- version branch or branches instead of main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants