OCM-23909 | fix: Remove unused sts:AssumeRole and sts:AssumeRoleWithW…#2730
OCM-23909 | fix: Remove unused sts:AssumeRole and sts:AssumeRoleWithW…#2730robpblake wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ebIdentity from OCM Role permission policy
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: robpblake The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (13)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (13)
WalkthroughAcross multiple STS OCM permission policy files (versions 4.10–4.22), the policy statements were updated to remove two STS role-assumption permissions ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 12✅ Passed checks (12 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.Comment |
…ebIdentity from OCM Role permission policy
What type of PR is this?
(bug/feature/cleanup/documentation)
What this PR does / why we need it?
Which Jira/Github issue(s) this PR fixes?
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Pre-checks (if applicable):
Tested latest changes against a cluster
Included documentation changes with PR
If this is a new object that is not intended for the FedRAMP environment (if unsure, please reach out to team FedRAMP), please exclude it with:
Summary by CodeRabbit