Skip to content

add command for test coverage#1177

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
cpmeadors:test_coverage_claude
Apr 11, 2026
Merged

add command for test coverage#1177
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
cpmeadors:test_coverage_claude

Conversation

@cpmeadors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cpmeadors cpmeadors commented Dec 3, 2025

PoC for analyzing test coverage and making it easier to understand. It just runs unit tests and looks for coverage files anywhere and then spits out a summary with recommendations. Coverage reports should probably be centralized. Also, other test suites should be run but they need more complex setup.

Test with claude: /coverage-summary

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpmeadors

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2025
@cpmeadors cpmeadors force-pushed the test_coverage_claude branch from 36ce5c1 to 8c552d3 Compare December 3, 2025 18:18
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 28, 2026

@cpmeadors: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/test-e2e-4-18 8c552d3 link true /test test-e2e-4-18

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kannon92 kannon92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fda9828c-324d-4896-b025-61ce2fa67b13

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 26e8559 and 2 for PR HEAD 8c552d3 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit ad29044 into openshift:main Apr 11, 2026
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants