Skip to content

[release-4.20] OCPBUGS-100175: Enforce workload partitioning in cluster compare - #880

Open
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift-kni:release-4.20from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-836-to-release-4.20
Open

[release-4.20] OCPBUGS-100175: Enforce workload partitioning in cluster compare#880
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift-kni:release-4.20from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-836-to-release-4.20

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #836

/assign imiller0

Update the cluster compare templates to require workload partitioning on all topologies for Core and RAN clusters

Signed-off-by: Ian Miller <imiller@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lack for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 3ada6e03-9317-48c6-87d7-5d9f51c25146

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-94172 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100175. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-100175: Enforce workload partitioning in cluster compare

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #836

/assign imiller0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-94172: Enforce workload partitioning in cluster compare [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-100175: Enforce workload partitioning in cluster compare Jul 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100175, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-94172 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #836

/assign imiller0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants