Skip to content

quote response exposes both price_impact and priceImpact #2

Description

@RachitSrivastava12

summary

the quote response appears to expose inconsistent field names for price impact.

i found both:

  • price_impact
  • priceImpact

expected

the api should expose one stable field name, or clearly document which one is current and whether the other is deprecated.

actual

clients need to support both names defensively because the response naming is inconsistent.

question

is one of these deprecated?
if so, which field should clients rely on going forward?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions