-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Strict Access Control to logs #82
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
component: FAPI 1: BaselineFAPI 1: BaselineFAPI 1: Baselinemigrated-from-bitbucketMigrated from BitbucketMigrated from Bitbucketpriority: minorMinor priorityMinor prioritytype: enhancementEnhancement or new featureEnhancement or new feature
Description
Activity
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
component: FAPI 1: BaselineFAPI 1: BaselineFAPI 1: Baselinemigrated-from-bitbucketMigrated from BitbucketMigrated from Bitbucketpriority: minorMinor priorityMinor prioritytype: enhancementEnhancement or new featureEnhancement or new feature
In section 7.4.1 of the read-only spec, there is a sentence that says "Strict access control to the logs in such cases should be enforced." -- is this a should as in a normative MUST, or did the spec the word should in a regular conversational way? It is unclear whether this spec is a recommendation or a command.
Bitbucket status: resolved
Bitbucket origin: issue 82