Skip to content

fix: course editor gets 403 copying a unit to the clipboard - #39075

Open
efortish wants to merge 2 commits into
openedx:masterfrom
eduNEXT:ks/issue-403-editor-clipboard-403
Open

fix: course editor gets 403 copying a unit to the clipboard #39075
efortish wants to merge 2 commits into
openedx:masterfrom
eduNEXT:ks/issue-403-editor-clipboard-403

Conversation

@efortish

@efortish efortish commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Closes openedx-authz#403.

A user with the Course Editor role gets a 403 Forbidden when trying to copy a unit to the clipboard in Studio, even though they can view and edit the course content normally elsewhere in Studio.

The issue is in ClipboardEndpoint.post() (openedx/core/djangoapps/content_staging/views.py), which uses has_studio_read_access() to check whether the user can read the course. That check only knows about the legacy CourseAccessRole roles (staff, instructor, limited staff, etc.) and doesn't account for AuthZ-native roles such as course_editor or course_auditor, which don't have a legacy equivalent.

As a result, users whose course access comes only from one of these AuthZ roles are denied by the clipboard endpoint, even though they have the appropriate permissions to work with the course in Studio.

This is the same type of issue fixed in openedx-authz#384, where _get_item_in_course was relying on a legacy write check for callers that only needed read access.

The fix follows the same approach: use user_has_course_permission() with the AuthZ COURSES_VIEW_COURSE permission, and fall back to the existing has_studio_read_access check through LegacyAuthoringPermission.READ when AuthZ course authoring is not enabled for the course.

This keeps the existing behavior unchanged for courses that have not been migrated to AuthZ.

ClipboardEndpoint.post() gated read access on has_studio_read_access(),
a legacy-only check with no knowledge of AuthZ-native roles like
course_editor and course_auditor. Switched to user_has_course_permission()
with COURSES_VIEW_COURSE, falling back to the same legacy check when AuthZ
course authoring isn't enabled for the course. Same pattern already used for
the same class of bug in openedx-authz#384.
Matches the existing test_no_course_permission's pattern for this same
endpoint: a PermissionDenied raised mid-request under
transaction.non_atomic_requests leaves ModuleStoreTestCase's cleanup
unable to run its own queries afterward, unless the assertion is wrapped
in allow_transaction_exception().
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Sep 3, 2026
@openedx-webhooks

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the pull request, @efortish!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-openedx-platform-oncall.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@rodmgwgu rodmgwgu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested in my local, working as described, Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Needs Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Course Editor receives 403 error when copy a unit to the clipboard

3 participants