Skip to content

fix: run PSR via uv to work around upstream GitPython break - #435

Merged
bmtcril merged 1 commit into
openedx:masterfrom
irfanuddinahmad:irfanuddinahmad/workaround-psr-gitpython-break
Aug 27, 2026
Merged

fix: run PSR via uv to work around upstream GitPython break#435
bmtcril merged 1 commit into
openedx:masterfrom
irfanuddinahmad:irfanuddinahmad/workaround-psr-gitpython-break

Conversation

@irfanuddinahmad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#434's release run (df86ef9) failed -- not from that fix, but from a separate, unrelated upstream break: python-semantic-release's GitHub Action builds its own Docker image fresh on every run and pins gitpython~=3.0 (unbounded), so it always installs the latest 3.x release. GitPython 3.1.60 (released 2026-08-25) removed Actor.name_email_regex, which PSR's config loader reads unconditionally -- breaking every fresh build of the action's image, regardless of which PSR version is pinned.

Tracked upstream: python-semantic-release/python-semantic-release#1476, fix open in #1477 but not yet merged/released.

Since we can't inject a dependency constraint into that Docker build from here, this runs the same PSR version (10.6.1) ourselves via uv, where we can pin gitpython<3.1.60. Verified locally against this repo in --noop mode -- resolves cleanly, computes the correct next version, no crash.

Safe to revert back to the uses: python-semantic-release/python-semantic-release@... action once upstream ships a fix.

python-semantic-release's GitHub Action builds its own Docker image fresh on every run and pins gitpython~=3.0 (unbounded). GitPython 3.1.60 (2026-08-25) removed Actor.name_email_regex, which PSR's config loader reads unconditionally, so every fresh build of the action's image fails with AttributeError -- confirmed on this repo's last release attempt. See python-semantic-release/python-semantic-release#1476, open, no fix released yet. Runs the same PSR version via uv instead, pinning gitpython below the break. Verified locally in --noop mode.
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U core contributor PR author is a Core Contributor (who may or may not have write access to this repo). labels Aug 27, 2026
@openedx-webhooks

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the pull request, @irfanuddinahmad!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/committers-events.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@bmtcril
bmtcril merged commit 3080b74 into openedx:master Aug 27, 2026
3 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Needs Triage to Done in Contributions Aug 27, 2026
irfanuddinahmad added a commit to irfanuddinahmad/event-tracking that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
openedx#435's uv-based workaround got past the GitPython crash (confirmed: correctly computed "The next version is: 4.1.1!") but hit a new failure at the build step: PSR's build_command shelled out to 'python -m pip install --upgrade build', and uv's ephemeral venvs deliberately don't bundle pip the way a stdlib venv does.

Rather than add pip back in (which would undercut the point of this whole pip->uv migration), switch build_command itself to 'uv build' -- no pip anywhere. Verified locally through the full real uvx-wrapped PSR execution (not just uv build standalone): produces the correct dist/ artifacts with no pip involved at any point.
bmtcril pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2026
python-semantic-release/python-semantic-release#1477 (merged 2026-08-28,
released in v10.6.2) fixes the GitPython 3.1.60 break that #435/#436
worked around. Reverts both back to using the official Docker action
(bumped v10.6.1 -> v10.6.2) and its pip-based build_command, since the
Docker image doesn't have uv available.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core contributor PR author is a Core Contributor (who may or may not have write access to this repo). open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants