Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) - abandoned#1686

Merged
jcchr merged 19 commits intomainfrom
renovate/main-pypi-protobuf-vulnerability
Mar 11, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) - abandoned#1686
jcchr merged 19 commits intomainfrom
renovate/main-pypi-protobuf-vulnerability

Conversation

@oep-renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@oep-renovate oep-renovate Bot commented Jan 30, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
protobuf ~=4.25.8~=5.29.6 age confidence
protobuf ~=4.24~=5.29 age confidence

protobuf affected by a JSON recursion depth bypass

CVE-2026-0994 / GHSA-7gcm-g887-7qv7

More information

Details

A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists in google.protobuf.json_format.ParseDict() in Python, where the max_recursion_depth limit can be bypassed when parsing nested google.protobuf.Any messages.

Due to missing recursion depth accounting inside the internal Any-handling logic, an attacker can supply deeply nested Any structures that bypass the intended recursion limit, eventually exhausting Python’s recursion stack and causing a RecursionError.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.2 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@oep-renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oep-renovate Bot commented Jan 30, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update artifacts related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: interactive_ai/migration_job/uv.lock
Command failed: uv lock --upgrade-package protobuf
Using CPython 3.10.19 interpreter at: /opt/containerbase/tools/python/3.10.19/bin/python3
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies:
  ╰─▶ Because grpcio-tools==1.60.0 depends on protobuf>=4.21.6,<5.0.dev0 and
      migration-job:dev depends on grpcio-tools==1.60.0, we can conclude that
      migration-job:dev depends on protobuf>=4.21.6,<5.0.dev0.
      And because migration-job:dev depends on protobuf>=5.29.6,<5.30.dev0
      and your project requires migration-job:dev, we can conclude that your
      project's requirements are unsatisfiable.

File name: platform/services/initial_user/uv.lock
Command failed: uv lock --upgrade-package protobuf
Using CPython 3.10.19 interpreter at: /opt/containerbase/tools/python/3.10.19/bin/python3
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies:
  ╰─▶ Because grpcio-tools==1.60.0 depends on protobuf>=4.21.6,<5.0.dev0 and
      initial-user:dev depends on grpcio-tools==1.60.0, we can conclude that
      initial-user:dev depends on protobuf>=4.21.6,<5.0.dev0.
      And because initial-user:dev depends on protobuf>=5.29.6,<5.30.dev0
      and your project requires initial-user:dev, we can conclude that your
      project's requirements are unsatisfiable.

Signed-off-by: oep-renovate[bot] <212772560+oep-renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@oep-renovate oep-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/main-pypi-protobuf-vulnerability branch from 317dce8 to ed34454 Compare February 6, 2026 03:16
@oep-renovate oep-renovate Bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v6 [security] (main) fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) Feb 6, 2026
@oep-renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oep-renovate Bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@oep-renovate oep-renovate Bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) - abandoned Mar 9, 2026
@oep-renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

oep-renovate Bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Autoclosing Skipped

This PR has been flagged for autoclosing. However, it is being skipped due to the branch being already modified. Please close/delete it manually or report a bug if you think this is in error.

@AlexanderBarabanov AlexanderBarabanov changed the title fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) - abandoned fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) Mar 9, 2026
@oep-renovate oep-renovate Bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) fix(deps): update dependency protobuf to v5 [security] (main) - abandoned Mar 10, 2026
@jcchr jcchr requested a review from Radwan-Ibrahim as a code owner March 10, 2026 11:41
@jcchr jcchr requested review from leoll2 and mpryahin as code owners March 10, 2026 11:41
Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
Comment on lines +19 to +25
.github/workflows/ @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk
.github/actions/ @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk
.github/bandit_config.yml @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk
.github/renovate.json5 @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk
.github/trivy_config.yml @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk
.github/trivyignore.yml @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk
security.md @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain @jcchr @piotrgrubicki @mgumowsk No newline at end of file
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's better to keep these under the exclusive control of @open-edge-platform/geti-ci-maintain for security reasons.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok - I removed new owners from CI section

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest removing all specific CODEOWNERS with the exception of security related files and replace the

# Default for anything not covered by one of the more specific rules below

with your names so the other teams don't get notifications anymores

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@leoll2 leoll2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes to CODEOWNERS are okay for me. To test the other changes, which include major version upgrade in core libraries (protobuf, grpc, ...), I'd recommend to run e2e tests on this branch and share the results.

@jcchr jcchr added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 11, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9f22b46 Mar 11, 2026
43 checks passed
@jcchr jcchr deleted the renovate/main-pypi-protobuf-vulnerability branch March 11, 2026 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants