docs(decisions): withdraw the wrong sc-1465 reference from PR #377's note - #381
docs(decisions): withdraw the wrong sc-1465 reference from PR #377's note#381norvalbv wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…note PR #377 shipped its decision note under the header `sc-1465 follow-up`. That reference is wrong and is withdrawn here. **sc-1465** is an unrelated bug: `core.hooksPath` is shared across linked worktrees and resolves to an absolute path under the *main* checkout, so a worktree's commits run the main checkout's `pre-commit` hook instead of its own committed copy. Its acceptance criterion is a per-worktree override (`git config --worktree core.hooksPath` with `extensions.worktreeConfig` enabled). That work is in flight on `fix/sc-1465-hookspath-owner` and is **not** done. Nothing in #377 touches it — the self-terminating run log, the phase stamping, and the setup/repository manifest fail-closed assertions are all unrelated to worktree hook resolution. **How it happened:** the ticket number was inferred from a local worktree directory name (`.claude/worktrees/sc-1465-hookspath-owner`) without reading the story. The real origin of that work is an autonomous P1 report claiming `devkit review` exits 0 on a drifted `core.hooksPath` — whose exit-code half did not reproduce, and whose log-opacity half did. Recorded as an append-only correction rather than an edit, per the store's own rule. Docs-only; no behaviour change. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 22 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
PR #377 shipped its decision note under the header
sc-1465 follow-up. That reference is wrong and is withdrawn here.sc-1465 is an unrelated bug:
core.hooksPathis shared across linked worktrees and resolves to an absolute path under the main checkout, so a worktree's commits run the main checkout'spre-commithook instead of its own committed copy. Its acceptance criterion is a per-worktree override (git config --worktree core.hooksPathwithextensions.worktreeConfigenabled). That work is in flight onfix/sc-1465-hookspath-ownerand is not done.Nothing in #377 touches it — the self-terminating run log, the phase stamping, and the setup/repository manifest fail-closed assertions are all unrelated to worktree hook resolution.
How it happened: the ticket number was inferred from a local worktree directory name (
.claude/worktrees/sc-1465-hookspath-owner) without reading the story. The real origin of that work is an autonomous P1 report claimingdevkit reviewexits 0 on a driftedcore.hooksPath— whose exit-code half did not reproduce, and whose log-opacity half did.Recorded as an append-only correction rather than an edit, per the store's own rule. Docs-only; no behaviour change.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code