Lints-year-sweep: #566 invalid-name-notation, #155 too-deep-object, #65 README embed GHA#3
Closed
nacNAC333 wants to merge 68 commits into
Closed
Lints-year-sweep: #566 invalid-name-notation, #155 too-deep-object, #65 README embed GHA#3nacNAC333 wants to merge 68 commits into
nacNAC333 wants to merge 68 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…of `foo-without-dot.eo`
…ary#875) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
….2.0 (objectionary#856) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ode in VocabularyTest
objectionary#882) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…jectionary#881) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ry#911) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…jectionary#908) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…FxEmpty` default
…ts test to FixTest
…nary#909) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…tionary#857) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…onary#850) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…7.6 (objectionary#792) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Owner
Author
|
Superseded by individual upstream PRs: objectionary#920 (objectionary#566), objectionary#921 (objectionary#155), objectionary#922 (objectionary#65) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
objectionary#566: invalid-name-notation lint
New XSL lint that checks @name attributes follow kebab-case convention.
objectionary#155: too-deep-object lint
New XSL lint that catches deeply nested EO objects (depth > 12).
objectionary#65: GHA workflow to embed lint list into README
GHA workflow that auto-generates the lint list in README on push to master.
Staging
Patches staged with patch.diff + REVIEW.md for each.
@rultor merge