Skip to content

Bug 2037736 - Added a store to the settings and implemented storeProvider for persisted state#255

Open
fmasalha wants to merge 1 commit into
mozilla-firefox:autolandfrom
fmasalha:settingsStoreImpl
Open

Bug 2037736 - Added a store to the settings and implemented storeProvider for persisted state#255
fmasalha wants to merge 1 commit into
mozilla-firefox:autolandfrom
fmasalha:settingsStoreImpl

Conversation

@fmasalha
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

View this pull request in Lando to land it once approved.

@fmasalha fmasalha force-pushed the settingsStoreImpl branch from 66399fb to cb09228 Compare May 20, 2026 17:53
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MatthewTighe MatthewTighe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, had a question and a couple thoughts but nothing blocking. LGTM! thanks for handling this one

Comment on lines 50 to 71
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is your problem to solve, but just FYI I'm not super happy that we have to have two stores here. This should work, since the "parent" store maintains the state, but it would be good for us as a team to invest in a richer solution at some point.

Comment on lines 80 to 87
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we file a follow-up to migrate this screen to a Store? I think we've had enough examples of working around the complexity here that it's probably worth just aligning on the common pattern

Comment on lines 59 to 64
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious to know: do we need to remember this controller or the callbacks object for a specific reason?

@MatthewTighe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It does look like the test failures in the try are real though, could you investigate that to make sure?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants