Skip to content

release: 0.5.0 - #23

Merged
izgorodin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/0.5.0
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

izgorodin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/0.5.0

Conversation

@izgorodin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Version bump for diversity on read() (#22). Owner: "сразу же выпускай".

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Σ <sigma@mnemoverse.ai>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

Next included review available in 1 minute.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 90 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Team
  • Run ID: c80be4eb-84db-473b-8068-e5cd27a1d77b
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5db94e2 and 481eb06.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • mnemoverse/__init__.py
  • pyproject.toml
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sigma-mnemoverse sigma-mnemoverse Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sigma Charlie v6 (subscription) reviewed 481eb06cc50f8d768391b8bf5ce01bae96c069c8 against base 5db94e21c318ccbb4349408afe96a2d97c230a30.

Executor: owner-login (producer on the owner's subscription login in Sigma's sandbox; verifier on Sigma's API keys through the credential gateway).

Run: fb4a5679-5405-462c-b4bf-85983c63e8cd.

Recorded attempt states: completed 1.

Verified findings: 0.

Supplied changed files: 3. Model-declared reviewed files: 3. These are accepted recorded declarations, not measured code coverage. Coverage gaps or unavailable declarations remain.

No required checks were configured.

Recorded API cost: known $0.000000; held $0.000000. Token-derived records, not an invoice. These are the recorded API amounts, not a current ledger lookup.

Subscription reference estimate: $0.260938 from 1 recorded observations; not a charge or invoice. It is separate from API cost. Subscription charges are unknown.

Scope notes

runtime/dependencies:

Dependencies were not prepared: the repository declares dependencies Sigma cannot prepare offline (it needs a root uv.lock, or only a root package.json with its package-lock.json). The project was not installed in the sandbox, so its tests could not run there.

producer/claude-review:

_openapi.json has no `diversity` field in the /memory/read request schema, which would appear to contradict the changelog's claim that diversity is 'passed to core's POST /memory/read'; but this file is unchanged by this diff and the diversity client code already existed in the 0.4.0 baseline (pre-existing, not introduced by this diff), so it is recorded only as a scope note, not a finding.

producer/claude-review:

The changelog's quantitative claims about server-side diversity behavior (applies only when matches > top_k and top_k is below 200) describe core service behavior (core#656) that cannot be verified from this repository; this is an external dependency outside the supplied snapshot.

producer/claude-review:

README.md and _openapi.json were checked only via targeted search for 'diversity'/'200', not read in full, since they are unchanged files outside the diff scope.

Severity: P0–P3 · What verified means.

@izgorodin
izgorodin merged commit 746ceb5 into main Oct 6, 2026
9 checks passed
@izgorodin
izgorodin deleted the release/0.5.0 branch October 6, 2026 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant