[efficiency-improver] perf: avoid GroupBy lazy evaluation for empty-check in AppendTestRunSummary#9300
Draft
Evangelink wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
…ummary Replace artifactGroups.Any() with _artifacts.Count > 0. The original code created a lazy GroupBy enumerator and called Any() on it, which iterated _artifacts to find the first element. The foreach loop below then re-enumerated _artifacts from scratch to build the Lookup. _artifacts is List<TestRunArtifact>, so .Count is O(1) and avoids the GroupBy allocation + first-pass traversal for the empty-check. The pattern _artifacts.Count == 0 is already used at line 140 of TerminalTestReporter.cs; this change applies the same idiom here. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR makes a small performance improvement in the Microsoft.Testing.Platform terminal reporter by avoiding a deferred-LINQ double-enumeration pattern when checking whether any artifacts exist before printing the artifacts section.
Changes:
- Replace
artifactGroups.Any()with_artifacts.Count > 0to avoid an extraGroupByenumeration and enumerator allocation. - Preserve existing output semantics while reducing redundant work in
AppendTestRunSummary.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/Terminal/TerminalTestReporter.Summary.cs | Avoids enumerating a lazy GroupBy sequence solely to check emptiness, reducing redundant iteration/allocation in the run summary rendering path. |
Copilot's findings
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 0
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal and Rationale
Replace
artifactGroups.Any()with_artifacts.Count > 0inTerminalTestReporter.Summary.cs.Focus area: Code-Level Efficiency
The original code:
GroupByis lazy. CallingAny()on the resultingIEnumerable<IGrouping<...>>iterates_artifactsonce to find the first element. Theforeachbelow then re-evaluates theGroupByfrom scratch, iterating_artifactsa second time. In total: two full passes over_artifactsplus two GroupBy enumerator allocations for every call toAppendTestRunSummary.Approach
_artifactsis declared asList<TestRunArtifact>(line 41 ofTerminalTestReporter.cs).List<T>.Countis an O(1) property read with no allocation. ReplacingartifactGroups.Any()with_artifacts.Count > 0:foreachas the sole consumer ofartifactGroups(one pass, unchanged)The semantics are equivalent: if
_artifactsis empty,GroupByproduces no groups; if non-empty, it always produces at least one group.Energy Efficiency Evidence
Proxy metric: Memory allocation count + iteration count (proxy for CPU energy draw)
_artifactsGroupBy()iter alloc +Any()callCountread, zero alloc_artifacts(n artifacts)This is an end-of-run path called once per test run. The absolute savings are modest, but the pattern is a clean correctness improvement (avoids a common lazy-LINQ double-evaluation pitfall). The same idiom (
_artifacts.Count == 0) is already used at line 140 ofTerminalTestReporter.cs.GSF principle — Hardware Efficiency: reducing unnecessary object allocations and loop iterations makes the same hardware do less work per functional unit (test run).
Trade-offs
None. The change reduces computational work, makes the code slightly clearer (intent: "do we have any artifacts?"), and is consistent with the existing
_artifacts.Count == 0guard in the same file.Reproducibility
No benchmarks needed for this path — the improvement is analytically demonstrable from the lazy-LINQ semantics. For profiling: run a test suite that produces artifacts and use dotnet-trace/PerfView to count allocations in
AppendTestRunSummary.Test Status
The change is a one-line expression substitution with no logic change. CI will run the full test suite.
Add this agentic workflows to your repo
To install this agentic workflow, run