⚡️ Speed up function merge_strings by 17%#1
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a 16% speedup through several targeted micro-optimizations: **Key Performance Improvements:** 1. **Eliminated expensive list comprehension for Hamming distance calculation**: The original code used a list comprehension that called `Hamming.distance()` for every potential overlap (37.8% of total time). The optimized version replaces this with a manual loop that includes string equality checks before calling Hamming, avoiding expensive distance calculations when strings are identical. 2. **Pre-cached string lengths**: Added `len_a_crop` and `len_b_crop` variables to avoid repeated `len()` calls during substring operations. 3. **Replaced lambda-based `min()` with manual loop**: The original code used `min(zero_matches, key=lambda x: abs(x - expected_overlap))` which was expensive (13.7% of time). The optimized version uses a simple loop to find the minimum, eliminating function call overhead. 4. **Optimized final scoring loop**: Instead of creating a `combined_scores` list and then finding its minimum index (5.9% of time), the optimized code scans through scores once, tracking the best score and index directly. 5. **Manual zero-matches collection**: Replaced list comprehension for finding zero scores with a manual loop and `append()`, reducing overhead. **Performance Characteristics by Test Case:** - **Large-scale tests with repeated patterns**: Show the biggest improvements (13-89% faster) due to the string equality shortcuts - **Small strings and edge cases**: Show minor improvements or slight regressions due to additional overhead from extra variables and checks - **Perfect overlap scenarios**: Benefit significantly from the string equality optimizations The optimizations are most effective for cases with longer strings and repeated character patterns, where the string equality checks can bypass expensive Hamming distance calculations.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 17% (0.17x) speedup for
merge_stringsindoctr/models/recognition/utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
7.12 milliseconds→6.09 milliseconds(best of208runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 16% speedup through several targeted micro-optimizations:
Key Performance Improvements:
Eliminated expensive list comprehension for Hamming distance calculation: The original code used a list comprehension that called
Hamming.distance()for every potential overlap (37.8% of total time). The optimized version replaces this with a manual loop that includes string equality checks before calling Hamming, avoiding expensive distance calculations when strings are identical.Pre-cached string lengths: Added
len_a_cropandlen_b_cropvariables to avoid repeatedlen()calls during substring operations.Replaced lambda-based
min()with manual loop: The original code usedmin(zero_matches, key=lambda x: abs(x - expected_overlap))which was expensive (13.7% of time). The optimized version uses a simple loop to find the minimum, eliminating function call overhead.Optimized final scoring loop: Instead of creating a
combined_scoreslist and then finding its minimum index (5.9% of time), the optimized code scans through scores once, tracking the best score and index directly.Manual zero-matches collection: Replaced list comprehension for finding zero scores with a manual loop and
append(), reducing overhead.Performance Characteristics by Test Case:
The optimizations are most effective for cases with longer strings and repeated character patterns, where the string equality checks can bypass expensive Hamming distance calculations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
common/test_models_recognition_utils.py::test_merge_strings🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-merge_strings-mg7ihvjwand push.