Skip to content

Fix conversion-blocking copy on PricingPage and SignupPage - #490

Open
manazoid4 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
nightly/copy-fixes-2026-08-20
Open

Fix conversion-blocking copy on PricingPage and SignupPage#490
manazoid4 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
nightly/copy-fixes-2026-08-20

Conversation

@manazoid4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • PricingPage: Replaced the confusing START AFTER COVERAGE CHECK → CTA label with a direct START PILOT — £39/MO →. The old label implied a prerequisite gate between the button and checkout, creating cognitive friction at conversion. Also rewrote the plan card priceNote and body to lead with the free-scan flow rather than bureaucratic activation language.
  • SignupPage: Removed the domestic-job holdover phrase "Gold leads for your trade and patch start coming through from day one" — which doesn't match the FTS public-tender qualification product — and replaced it with accurate product-aligned copy.

Test plan

  • Visit /pricing — confirm plan card CTA now reads START PILOT — £39/MO → and plan card body describes the free-scan-first flow clearly
  • Visit /signup — confirm the description accurately reflects the public-tender product, not domestic job leads
  • Run npm run build — confirm clean build with no TypeScript errors

Generated by Claude Code

…ignupPage

PricingPage: remove confusing 'START AFTER COVERAGE CHECK' CTA that
implied a prerequisite gate; replace with direct 'START PILOT — £39/MO'
label. Rewrite plan card priceNote and body to lead with the free-scan
flow rather than bureaucratic activation language.

SignupPage: replace domestic-job holdover 'Gold leads for your trade
and patch start coming through from day one' with accurate product
description matching the public-tender qualification product.
@supabase

supabase Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project nfjwuwsuaapufmkppoeo because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
job-filter-v1 Ready Ready Preview Aug 20, 2026 12:51pm

Removes libc fields from optional native package entries — a benign
lockfile normalisation from the CI npm version, no dependency changes.
Run npm audit fix to update nanoid >= 3.3.18 and postcss >= 8.5.23.
Clears the high-severity finding that blocked the required CI check.
Also includes next-env.d.ts update from the build run.
@alwaysmeticulous

alwaysmeticulous Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Meticulous spotted 0 visual differences across 169 screens tested: view results.

Meticulous evaluated ~4 hours of user flows against your PR.

Expected differences? Click here. Last updated for commit be365cc fix: rephrase signup copy to avoid implying tender matches are guarantee.... This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9b6e0343ac

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/pages/SignupPage.tsx Outdated
…teed

Replace 'qualified public-tender matches start from day one' with
'scan and qualify opportunities — empty results shown honestly' to
match the honest-empty-result messaging on the pricing and find-jobs
pages. Addresses Codex review finding on PR #490.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants