Skip to content

Copy polish: pricing headline, competitor FAQ, nav CTA, scan limit clarity - #484

Open
manazoid4 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
nightly/copy-polish-2026-08-19
Open

Copy polish: pricing headline, competitor FAQ, nav CTA, scan limit clarity#484
manazoid4 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
nightly/copy-polish-2026-08-19

Conversation

@manazoid4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Nightly build run — copy polish across three files. Build passes green, TypeScript clean.

  • PricingPage: Replace the exact-duplicate homepage headline with a pain-led "STOP WASTING BID TIME ON TENDERS THAT DON'T FIT YOUR FIRM." Adds a new FAQ entry naming Checkatrade, Bark and MyBuilder explicitly to explain the public-procurement positioning. Updates the micro-label from "FOUNDER-ASSISTED PILOT" (insider language) to "COVERAGE-FIRST PILOT — CHECK BEFORE YOU PAY".
  • FindJobsPage: Sharpen the no-scan-yet prompt to lead with fear ("TIRED OF CHASING THE WRONG JOBS?") then move to control ("SEE WHICH PUBLIC CONTRACTS FIT YOUR TRADE — BEFORE YOU BID."). Clarify the exhausted-scans banner — removes the jargon "Buyer and submission context locked" and replaces with plain "3 free scans used. Scanning stays open — unlock buyer, deadline and submission details at £39/mo."
  • TopNav: Replace the acronym CTA "CHECK FTS FREE" with plain-English "SCAN FREE — NO CARD" so new visitors understand the action without knowing what FTS stands for.

Site health finding fixed

NEEDLE: Desktop nav CTA "CHECK FTS FREE" was jargon to new visitors unfamiliar with the FTS acronym.
CRITIC: "SCAN FREE — NO CARD" passes the 3-second clarity test — immediate action + benefit, no jargon.
REVENUE: Clearer CTA gets more free trial users into the funnel who then convert to £39/mo.


Generated by Claude Code

…v CTA, scan limit copy

- PricingPage: Replace duplicate homepage headline with pain-point-led "STOP WASTING BID TIME ON TENDERS THAT DON'T FIT YOUR FIRM"
- PricingPage: Add Checkatrade/Bark/MyBuilder competitor FAQ entry explaining the public-procurement positioning
- PricingPage: Change micro-label from "FOUNDER-ASSISTED PILOT" to "COVERAGE-FIRST PILOT — CHECK BEFORE YOU PAY"
- FindJobsPage: Sharpen no-scan-yet section headline to lead with fear then control (wrong jobs → clear BID/WATCH/SKIP)
- FindJobsPage: Clarify exhausted-scans message — removes jargon "Buyer and submission context locked", adds specific upgrade hook
- TopNav: Replace acronym CTA "CHECK FTS FREE" with plain-English "SCAN FREE — NO CARD"
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
job-filter-v1 Ready Ready Preview Aug 19, 2026 6:48am

@supabase

supabase Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project nfjwuwsuaapufmkppoeo because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

@alwaysmeticulous

alwaysmeticulous Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Meticulous spotted 0 visual differences across 169 screens tested: view results.

Meticulous evaluated ~4 hours of user flows against your PR.

Expected differences? Click here. Last updated for commit 2863e06 Fix high-severity nanoid vulnerability and update lock file. This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

npm audit fix upgrades nanoid to >=3.3.18 to address GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8
(custom generators could loop indefinitely when size is zero).
Also fixes postcss moderate vulnerability via updated transitive deps.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants