Skip to content

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkcore.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkcore#529

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkcore.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkcore#529
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

我来对这个 Git diff 进行详细的代码审查:

  1. 代码逻辑改进:
  • 将版本判断逻辑从基于 PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR 改为使用 DTK5 option,这样更清晰且易于维护
  • 统一使用 DTK_NAME_SUFFIX 替代 DTK_VERSION_MAJOR,使得命名更规范
  • 修复了拼写错误:BUIILD_TESTING -> BUILD_TESTING
  1. 代码质量提升:
  • 移除了无用的注释代码(如 add_sub_dir 宏中的注释)
  • 使用 message(STATUS) 替代普通 message,提供更好的构建日志
  • 改进了条件判断的可读性,如 if(NOT DTK5) 比 if(NOT DTK_VERSION_MAJOR) 更直观
  1. 性能优化:
  • 将 sanitizer 选项限制在 Debug 构建类型中,避免在 Release 构建中引入不必要的性能开销
  • 添加了 RPATH 设置,确保测试程序能正确找到依赖库
  1. 安全性改进:
  • 在 tests/CMakeLists.txt 中添加了条件编译,确保 sanitizer 只在需要时启用
  • 改进了版本控制逻辑,避免了版本混乱的可能性
  1. 其他建议:
  • 考虑在 CMakeLists.txt 顶部添加更多注释,说明 DTK5/DTK6 的区别
  • 可以考虑将一些重复的配置提取为公共变量或函数
  • 建议在文档生成部分添加版本检查,确保文档版本与实际版本一致
  1. 文件组织:
  • 配置文件和模板文件的修改保持了一致性
  • 示例代码和工具的修改都遵循了新的命名规范

总体来说,这次改动提高了代码的可维护性和一致性,使得 DTK5 和 DTK6 的版本管理更加清晰。改动是正向的,建议合并。

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

  • 敏感词检查失败, 检测到2个文件存在敏感词
详情
{
    "CMakeLists.txt": [
        {
            "line": "  HOMEPAGE_URL \"https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtkcore\"",
            "line_number": 9,
            "rule": "S35",
            "reason": "Url link | e18a6b5679"
        }
    ],
    "docs/CMakeLists.txt": [
        {
            "line": "execute_process(COMMAND git clone https://github.com/linuxdeepin/doxygen-theme.git --depth=1",
            "line_number": 41,
            "rule": "S35",
            "reason": "Url link | d2deace9b0"
        }
    ]
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants