Repository navigation
feat(Semantics/Composition): intensions in the engine, real IFA - #5869
Merged
Merged
Conversation
hawkrobe
disabled auto-merge
October 27, 2026 20:43
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The composition engine interprets relative to a world, and intensional application gives the function its argument's whole intension (von Fintel & Heim (25), Heim & Kratzer (9) p. 308).
Mode.intension,Term.intension,Tree.intension; the existing evaluation is their case of a lexicon that does not vary with the world;Mode.forall_eval_intensionalLeft_eq_iffties constant-intension application to extensionality (refactor(Semantics/Composition): extensional operators via DependsOn #5866)