Skip to content

docs: separate CCIP Direct Staking contracts - #977

Merged
iamnp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/direct-staking-deployed-contracts
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

docs: separate CCIP Direct Staking contracts#977
iamnp merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/direct-staking-deployed-contracts

Conversation

@tamtamchik

@tamtamchik tamtamchik commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Move CCIP Direct Staking contracts out of the Lido Multichain section.
  • Group Ethereum and L2 deployments in a dedicated section after Multichain.

Impact

The deployed-contracts page now presents Direct Staking as a separate top-level item. Contract addresses and links are unchanged.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR reorganizes the “deployed-contracts” documentation to present Chainlink CCIP Direct Staking contracts as their own top-level section, separate from the “Lido Multichain” section, while keeping all addresses and explorer links unchanged.

Changes:

  • Removed CCIP Direct Staking contract listings from the “Lido Multichain” section (including per-network sublists).
  • Added a new top-level “CCIP Direct Staking” section placed after “Lido Multichain”, grouping Ethereum (common) and L2 deployments per network.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@tamtamchik
tamtamchik marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2026 13:50
@tamtamchik
tamtamchik requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2026 13:50
@tamtamchik
tamtamchik force-pushed the docs/direct-staking-deployed-contracts branch from 4c20a7a to 67ae889 Compare August 18, 2026 14:19
@iamnp
iamnp merged commit 9b74002 into main Aug 19, 2026
1 check passed
@iamnp
iamnp deleted the docs/direct-staking-deployed-contracts branch August 19, 2026 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants