docs(devlog): 260815 old-draft triage plan, matrix, worker packets - #1745
Conversation
|
✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed. |
github-actions
Bot
added
the
documentation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded a documented process for triaging 18 older draft pull requests. The records define dispositions, repair scopes, execution procedures, validation requirements, and pending release-readiness status. ChangesOld Draft Triage
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers: ✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
✅ READY
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 93b98c1675
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## Disposition summary (010 has full evidence) | ||
|
|
||
| - CLOSE (2): #1498 (superseded by policy routing + #1702, 31 unresolved defects), #1367 (retired seam, 10 blockers). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The disposition summary still directs the executor to close these two drafts, and the wp2 map repeats that action, while 010_triage_matrix.md explicitly says the audit reversed both decisions because closing them would discard requirements that remain unimplemented. An executor following this overview can therefore close valid drafts contrary to the final audit; update the objective, summary, and wp2 counts to KEEP-DRAFT (8).
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| | #1367 bounded JSON fallback | Redesign around current registry-only compat + terminal-repair architecture; 10 unresolved blockers | | ||
| | #1552 Command Code OAuth pool | 2565-line auth-boundary change; needs maintainer security sponsorship, real GUI screenshot, rebase | | ||
| | #1703 claude classifier affinity | Real defect but implementation can silently cross provider privacy/billing boundaries; maintainer design hold | | ||
| | #1645 vision chat/Google sidecars | 5 verified blockers incl. OAuth-over-HTTP loopback (describe-chat.ts:25) and missing image-boundary checks | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This row publishes a concrete OAuth transport weakness and missing boundary checks for a still-open draft, while adjacent rows similarly record unresolved authentication and identity-boundary findings. Because devlog/ is tracked publicly and these defects have not shipped as fixes, the security details belong in .tmp/; retain only an already-public outcome in the repository.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L97-L100
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary\n\nDevlog unit for the old-draft triage round (18 PRs): 000 plan, 010 evidence matrix (A-audited twice, CLOSE calls revised to KEEP-DRAFT), 020 worker packets with repair specs. Companion to #1744 (which landed the light six).\n\n## Verification\n\nDocs-only; no code changes. privacy:scan green locally.\n\n## Checklist\n\n- [x] Targets dev\n- [x] No code changes
Summary by CodeRabbit