docs: signed commits deliberately not required (resolves #153, option 2) - #160
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…e open question Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
cpitzi
enabled auto-merge (squash)
August 18, 2026 01:00
Contributor
terraform plan (success) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #153 with the decline option, per the operator's call (2026-08-17): the fleet does not require signed commits on
mainyet, and the resolution this codifies is a documented decision rather than a naked lint ignore.terraform/README.mdgains § "Signed commits — deliberately not required": the rationale (PR-only main means squash authorship + the PR record carry provenance; the supply-chain boundary that matters is covered by SLSA attestations and SHA pins) and the adopt-later path (keys for every committer identity including Apps → verified coverage → then the flag).terraform/protection.tf'strivy:ignore:AVD-GIT-0004now points at that section instead of an open question — the state Policy decision: require signed commits on main? (tf-lint GIT-0004) #153 existed to forbid was ignored without a decision, and this ends it with one.No resource changes; plan should show only the known #148 perpetual diff.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code