feat(java): expose index segment sizes - #8355
Merged
Xuanwo merged 1 commit intoAug 7, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 7, 2026
majin1102
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 7, 2026 03:57
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Gate recommendation: approve.
This closes the Java binding gap at the existing metadata boundary: per-segment sizes remain attached to Index, aggregate size follows the Rust IndexDescription contract, and legacy unknown sizes stay optional. The thin JNI mapping is preferable to storage listing or a parallel UUID-to-size structure because it reuses metadata already loaded and avoids an extra source of truth.
Xuanwo
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Index#getSizeBytes()IndexDescription#getTotalSizeBytes()Optional.empty()for indices created before file-size tracking and retain the existing public constructorWhy
Rust and Python already expose persisted index file-size metadata, while Java drops it at the JNI boundary. Java engines therefore cannot inspect physical segment sizes when planning index maintenance, including the size-tiered work tracked in lance-spark#744.
Validation
./mvnw -Dtest=DatasetTest#testDescribeIndicesByName test./mvnw spotless:checkcargo clippy --target-dir target/rust-maven-plugin/lance-jni --tests --manifest-path ./lance-jni/Cargo.toml -- -D warnings