Run benchmarks on CodSpeed in CI#13
Merged
Merged
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Jul 24, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
🆕 12 new benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🆕 | Simulation | inferred_typed_dict_64 |
N/A | 748.3 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | exhaustive_match_48 |
N/A | 424.5 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | enum_member_reads_512 |
N/A | 21.2 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | isinstance_chain_64 |
N/A | 298.6 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | overload_resolution_10x20 |
N/A | 5.7 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | protocol_binding_mismatch_100x10 |
N/A | 13 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | smoke |
N/A | 337.7 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | typevar_join_256 |
N/A | 6.7 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | union_pattern_read_32 |
N/A | 83 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | Simulation | variadic_any_call_256 |
N/A | 895.8 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | WallTime | cold_start_go_to_definition |
N/A | 193.6 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | WallTime | error_propagation |
N/A | 17.8 ms | N/A |
Comparing codspeed-ci (7037c9f) with main (5c755c4)2
Footnotes
-
2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
main(21ed80d) during the generation of this report, so 5c755c4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩
Loading