fix(runtime): mitigate SQLite contention with bounded recovery - #177
Open
kingsword09 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
kingsword09 wants to merge 1 commit into
kingsword09 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Related to #162. Keep the issue open pending validation on the original workload.
commit: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Concurrent CLI processes can still fail with
SQLITE_BUSYafter the existing 10-second wait, while every usage fact starts another cleanup transaction. Add bounded recovery around audited native storage operations and reduce maintenance writes.Related to #162. This is a contention mitigation; the production outcome is still unconfirmed. #162 remains open pending validation on the reporter's original Linux workload.
Validation completed locally on macOS:
Synchronous workflow-journal and permission-mode APIs retain their native behavior. Non-idempotent counter operations are ordered but are not replayed. There is no database schema change or sharding; sustained contention can still exceed the budget. Hosted Linux CI and reporter validation are still required before judging the production outcome.