bpf: Check tail zero of bpf_map_info and bpf_prog_info#12365
Draft
Asphaltt wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Since there're 4 bytes padding at the end of struct bpf_map_info, they
won't be checked by bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero().
pahole -C bpf_map_info ./vmlinux
struct bpf_map_info {
...
__u64 hash __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 88 8 */
__u32 hash_size; /* 96 4 */
/* size: 104, cachelines: 2, members: 18 */
/* padding: 4 */
/* forced alignments: 1 */
/* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
If a future kernel extension adds a new 4-byte field, older userspace
programs allocating this structure on the stack might inadvertently pass
uninitialized stack garbage into the new field, permanently breaking
backward compatibility. -- sashiko [1]
Fix it by changing sizeof(info) to
offsetofend(struct bpf_map_info, hash_size).
And, add "__u32 :32" to the tail of struct bpf_map_info.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260513224823.6494FC19425@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: ea2e646 ("bpf: Return hashes of maps in BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD")
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Since there're 4 bytes padding at the end of struct bpf_prog_info, they
won't be checked by bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero().
pahole -C bpf_prog_info ./vmlinux
struct bpf_prog_info {
...
__u32 attach_btf_obj_id; /* 220 4 */
__u32 attach_btf_id; /* 224 4 */
/* size: 232, cachelines: 4, members: 38 */
/* sum members: 224 */
/* sum bitfield members: 1 bits, bit holes: 1, sum bit holes: 31 bits */
/* padding: 4 */
/* forced alignments: 9 */
/* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
If a future kernel extension adds a new 4-byte field, older userspace
programs allocating this structure on the stack might inadvertently pass
uninitialized stack garbage into the new field, permanently breaking
backward compatibility. -- sashiko [1]
Fix it by changing sizeof(info) to
offsetofend(struct bpf_prog_info, attach_btf_id).
And, add "__u32 :32" to the tail of struct bpf_prog_info.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260513224823.6494FC19425@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: aba64c7 ("bpf: Add verified_insns to bpf_prog_info and fdinfo")
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
…p,prog]_info Add two tests to verify that the tail padding 4 bytes of struct bpf_map_info and bpf_prog_info are checked in syscall.c using bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(). Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
882da95 to
e867594
Compare
d9ed865 to
1b36123
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.