Skip to content

Stabilize D-AI-Hub V1 canonical truth - #35

Merged
keida merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/v1-stabilization-20260904
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

keida merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/v1-stabilization-20260904

Conversation

@keida

@keida keida commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary:\n- Separate private-by-intent product wording from live GitHub visibility and keep mutable PR/CI data query-only.\n- Add the query-only STATUS health contract with rejection of malformed, duplicate, and split legacy fields.\n- No runtime refactor.\n\nVerification:\n- Affected health tests: 10 passed. Broader health regression: 68 passed, 1 skipped.\n- Reused full non-integration: 741 passed, 9 skipped; integration: 49 passed, 1 skipped; typecheck/build passed.\n- Structural index/frontmatter/Markdown checks passed; added-line secret-like scan found 0 matches.\n- Repository visibility remains PUBLIC and unchanged; no private material was added.\n- Merge performed: NO.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-03T20:46:27.779882Z afb14b8 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: afb14b85a2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +179 to 180
} else if (!hasStablePrFields) {
findings.push(...legacyPullRequestFindings(project, lifecycle, currentPr, true));

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reject legacy PR snapshots in query-only mode

When an active project's STATUS.md still contains - Current PR: #29 (open), this branch delegates to legacyPullRequestFindings, which returns no finding and does not require the canonical query-only boundary. The health check therefore accepts the mutable live-PR snapshot that the newly added canonical-truth decision requires checkpoints to avoid, allowing stale external state to remain in a supposedly healthy repository; reject Current PR snapshots rather than treating this legacy format as valid.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@keida
keida merged commit 8f89ab0 into main Sep 3, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant