Repository navigation
ConfigurationParameters values does not appear to be comprehensively documented #2516
Closed as duplicate
Description
I searched https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#running-tests-config-params and the surefire plugin (which seems to have some different values from what I found in the user-guide. Could you please add a comprehensive list to this section of documentation?
Activity
sormuras commentedon Jan 6, 2021
Related to #1803
marcphilipp commentedon Jan 7, 2021
They should all be documented here: https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/api/org.junit.jupiter.engine/org/junit/jupiter/engine/Constants.html
xenoterracide commentedon Jan 7, 2021
could a link to that be added to the
ConfigurationParametersjavadoc? because that's where I looked, and found via googlemarcphilipp commentedon May 13, 2021
The problem is that
ConfigurationParametersdoesn't depend on Jupiter. Thus adding a link theConstantsclass is not possible AFAIK. We could add a section to the user guide that lists all configuration parameters and link there, though. Thoughts?marcphilipp commentedon May 13, 2021
Tentatively slated for 5.8 M2 solely for the purpose of team discussion.
xenoterracide commentedon May 13, 2021
up to you in my opinion, you could also do a normal web link. I'm fine with whatever, I just want it to be easier to find ;)
marcphilipp commentedon May 14, 2021
Team decision: Add a table containing all config parameters (Platform, Jupiter, Vintage (?)) in the user guide and link to it from the class-level Javadoc of
ConfigurationParameters.stale commentedon Aug 15, 2022
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Given the limited bandwidth of the team, it will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contribution.
xenoterracide commentedon Aug 15, 2022
sbrannen commentedon Apr 19, 2023
All constants can also be viewed in the Javadoc:
https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/api/constant-values.html
marcphilipp commentedon Mar 1, 2025
Closing in favor of #4330 which has more information
github-actions commentedon May 4, 2026
This issue was resolved and the conversation been locked due to inactivity.
The JUnit team generally speaking doesn't look at resolved issues. If you do have a similar request or problem, please create a new issue. You can include a reference to this issue to provide additional context.