docs(skill): PR lifecycle discipline - fold-first, rebase cadence, closure conventions#2055
Conversation
…, closure conventions Codifies the working agreements the review gate already enforces: findings outrank new slices, CONFLICTING PRs get rebased promptly, a green computed before the base moved is stale, closures always link their successor, and one PR per slice. Grounded in this week's real cases (#2009/#1932 semantic conflict, the #1927/#1924 closure forensics, the store-signing fragmentation).
Qodo reviews are paused for this user.Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more → On a Teams plan? Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center? |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe contributor skill documentation adds PR lifecycle rules covering existing findings, rebasing and CI reruns, successor-linked closures, and one-PR-per-slice organization. ChangesPR lifecycle guidance
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
|
||
| ### One PR per slice | ||
|
|
||
| - A fix and the test that proves it belong in ONE PR (pitfall 13 in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
WARNING: Reference to docs/contributor-pitfalls.md (and "pitfall 13") may be an unreachable path/number.
This section instructs agents to read docs/contributor-pitfalls.md and cites "pitfall 13". I was unable to verify the file exists at that exact path or that the pitfall numbering matches (the sandbox blocked the verification API calls). If the path is wrong (e.g. it lives under a different directory) or the numbering has drifted, the instruction silently breaks and agents won't find the referenced items. Please confirm the path resolves from repo root and that pitfall #13 is in fact the fix-and-test-in-one-PR item; consider linking the absolute repo path or a heading anchor instead of a bare relative path.
Reply with @kilocode-bot fix it to have Kilo Code address this issue.
Code Review SummaryStatus: 1 Issue Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
Files Reviewed (1 file)
Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Reviewed by hy3:free · Input: 36.7K · Output: 2.2K · Cached: 125.8K |
|
Verified against origin/dev: docs/contributor-pitfalls.md exists (merged today via #2040) and item 13 is exactly the cited rule ("A fix and its test belong in one PR"). The bot could not reach the file from its sandbox; the reference is correct as written. Merging. |
Adds a PR lifecycle section to the taOS development skill so builder agents using it inherit the working agreements the review gate already enforces:
Docs-only. Once merged, agents pull latest dev to pick up the updated skill.
Summary by CodeRabbit