Harden plan builder lifecycle and MCP efficiency#229
Merged
Conversation
jamil2018
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 18, 2026 08:41
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The supervised BeWise plan-builder happy path exposed lifecycle dead ends, oversized responses, stale validation guidance, duplicate events, and UI actions remaining available on historical evidence.
Validation
npm run validate:unit: 926 passednpm --prefix packages/appraisejs run test: 121 passednpm --prefix packages/appraisejs run test:mcp:e2enpm run buildnpm run check:harnessnpm run release:check:artifactsnpm run release:check:packagesnpm run graphify:autoThe transient BeWise audit plan/review/validation artifacts are intentionally excluded from this PR.