Allow multiple departments on screening #115
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rimi-itk
force-pushed
the
feature/screening-multiple-departments
branch
from
7b87580 to
965e268
Compare
rimi-itk
force-pushed
the
feature/rename-projekt-to-screening
branch
from
634fbdf to
874a065
Compare
rimi-itk
changed the title
rimi-itk
force-pushed
the
feature/screening-multiple-departments
branch
from
722c7a3 to
6a5ddfc
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to ticket
https://leantime.itkdev.dk/_#/tickets/showTicket/6338
Description
Allows multiple departments on a screening.
Note
This pull request uses the feature/rename-projekt-to-screening branch (cf. #114) as base, i.e. a "project" is (now) called as "screening".
Screenshot of the result
Checklist
If your code does not pass all the requirements on the checklist you have to add a comment explaining why this change
should be exempt from the list.
Additional comments or questions
If you have any further comments or questions for the reviewer please add them here.