Skip to content

Improve handling of time stamp pattern in factories#331

Draft
ckittl wants to merge 28 commits into
devfrom
ck/#330-factoryTimestampPattern
Draft

Improve handling of time stamp pattern in factories#331
ckittl wants to merge 28 commits into
devfrom
ck/#330-factoryTimestampPattern

Conversation

@ckittl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ckittl ckittl commented Apr 16, 2021

Closes #330. Take care of #329 beforehand.

@ckittl ckittl added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 16, 2021
@ckittl ckittl added this to the Version 2.0 milestone Apr 16, 2021
@ckittl ckittl requested a review from a team April 16, 2021 12:44
@ckittl ckittl self-assigned this Apr 16, 2021
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 16, 2021

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.95%. Comparing base (7995b54) to head (f25150e).
⚠️ Report is 3691 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev     #331      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     77.97%   77.95%   -0.02%     
- Complexity     2102     2105       +3     
============================================
  Files           257      257              
  Lines          8407     8401       -6     
  Branches        815      814       -1     
============================================
- Hits           6555     6549       -6     
- Misses         1447     1449       +2     
+ Partials        405      403       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ckittl ckittl force-pushed the ck/#330-factoryTimestampPattern branch from fc8fedd to f25150e Compare April 21, 2021 09:22
@sebastian-peter sebastian-peter modified the milestones: Version 4.1, Version 4.2 Nov 2, 2023
@sebastian-peter sebastian-peter modified the milestones: Version 4.2, Version 5.0 Feb 12, 2024
@staudtMarius
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@danielfeismann, @sebastian-peter I think this PR and the related issue can be closed, since we removed the time pattern input from the factories.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consistency check for date time pattern if using InfluxDB

4 participants