Skip to content

refactor: rename Hexadeca → unified-api-adapter (estate-wide) - #88

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor/unified-api-adapter
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor/unified-api-adapter

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Estate-wide rename Hexadeca-Connector → UnifiedApiAdapter (full inventory rename, verified zero residual hexadeca in-tree).

  • panic-attack-hexadeca.ymlpanic-attack-unified-api-adapter.yml; workflow name, job id/display, step names, and artifact panic-findings-unified-api-adapter renamed. This workflow is on.*.paths-filtered, so per estate CI convention it is not a required check — no required-context list changes needed.
  • actions.lock key renamed in lockstep with the workflow file (line 49), keeping gh-actions-lock reconciliation green.
  • main-estate-audit.yml: step display + uses:zig-unified-api-adapter-check@main (new path live via cicd-suite#26; old path still exists until contract, so no break window).
  • assail-hexadecaassail-unified-api-adapter in both Justfile mirrors (root + .machine_readable/contractiles/), verified byte-identical.
  • nesy-solver-api connector README, nesy_solver_api.h, Types.idr, and 6a2/ A2ML prose renamed. The 16 SURFACES protocol names themselves are untouched.

Part of: hypatia#805 (canonical) + cicd-suite#26 (action expand) + 26 consumer migrations.

- workflow panic-attack-hexadeca.yml -> panic-attack-unified-api-adapter.yml
  (name/job/steps/artifact renamed; actions.lock key renamed in lockstep)
- main-estate-audit.yml flips to cicd-suite zig-unified-api-adapter-check@main
  (expand phase live since cicd-suite#26)
- Justfile assail-hexadeca -> assail-unified-api-adapter (both contractile mirrors)
- connector README/header/Types.idr + 6a2 A2ML prose renamed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit bfc9390 into main Sep 21, 2026
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the refactor/unified-api-adapter branch September 21, 2026 00:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant