Skip to content

chore: remove extensionless MAINTAINERS duplicate - #77

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/dedupe-maintainers
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

chore: remove extensionless MAINTAINERS duplicate#77
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/dedupe-maintainers

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Removes the extensionless MAINTAINERS, superseded by MAINTAINERS.adoc.

This isn't only a duplicate — the removed file was wrong. It carried:

  • no SPDX header
  • maintainership attributed to "Metadatastician / @metadatastician"

while MAINTAINERS.adoc carries the CC-BY-SA-4.0 header and correctly names Jonathan D.A. Jewell as Lead Maintainer. It is scaffold boilerplate — byte-identical across 37 of 40 repos that had it, the other 3 trivial variants.

Owner-directed 2026-08-26. Raised as a PR because this repo's ruleset requires pull requests and verified signatures, which a direct API commit cannot satisfy.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Scaffold boilerplate superseded by MAINTAINERS.adoc. The removed file
carried no SPDX header and attributed maintainership to
'Metadatastician / @metadatastician'; MAINTAINERS.adoc carries the
CC-BY-SA-4.0 header and names Jonathan D.A. Jewell as Lead Maintainer.

Owner-directed 2026-08-26. Done via PR because these repos' rulesets
require pull requests and verified signatures.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit ffaf98d into main Aug 26, 2026
4 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the chore/dedupe-maintainers branch August 26, 2026 13:00
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f85a2a83-1a56-4c1b-8cb3-2e6d023d5bab

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8d4bb3 and b0ef9dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • MAINTAINERS

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed the project maintainer list and related onboarding, responsibilities, expectations, and update guidance.

Walkthrough

The pull request deletes the MAINTAINERS file. No exported or public entities change.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Maintainer documentation
MAINTAINERS
Removes the maintainer list, onboarding guidance, responsibilities, expectations, and update metadata.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Poem

A rabbit found the list had flown
The burrow kept its files alone
No public code changed today
The guidance hopped away
Fresh carrots mark the empty page


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@gitar-bot

gitar-bot Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

You are using the Gitar free plan. Upgrade to unlock code review, CI analysis, auto-apply, custom automations, and more.

Gitar

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR successfully removes the redundant and outdated extensionless MAINTAINERS file, ensuring that maintainer information is consolidated within MAINTAINERS.adoc. No security vulnerabilities, logic errors, or quality issues were identified. The repository remains up to standards following this change.

Test suggestions

  • Confirm deletion of the MAINTAINERS file

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant