fix(ws): add trigger fields to BasicOrder websocket updates#193
Open
knoal wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
BasicOrderBasicOrdermore closely with RESTBasicOrderInfonulltifWhat changed
src/ws/sub_structs.rstrigger_condition: Stringis_trigger: booltrigger_px: Stringis_position_tpsl: boolreduce_only: boolorder_type: Stringtif: Option<String>Why
WebSocket
OrderUpdatepayloads were missing fields that are already present in RESTBasicOrderInfo, which made it hard to identify trigger orders and inspect TP/SL-related metadata from real-time order updates alone.This brings websocket order updates in line with the data already available through REST and avoids forcing consumers to poll for order details.
Validation
cargo fmtcargo testcargo clippy -- -D warningsCloses #192