[clubanderson]

Summary

• Reword Goose/AAIF references so Hive is only described as an independent CNCF project integrating/tracking Goose upstream.
• Remove AAIF listing/eligibility language and avoid wording that implies Hive joins, aligns with, is hosted by, or is part of AAIF.
• Retitled and reworded 📖 docs: track Goose upstream after its move to the Agentic AI Foundation #10636 PR metadata to match the maintainer wording constraint.

Validation

• Grep audit for forbidden AAIF wording in the touched files and PR metadata.
• git diff --check.
• code-review agent: no findings.

[clubanderson]

/approve
/lgtm

[kubestellar-prow]

@clubanderson: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[kubestellar-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: clubanderson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [clubanderson]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[hivecommons-hive]

One wording question a human should settle before this lands; the rest of the rewording is consistent with the rest of the tree.

"independent CNCF project" asserts a status the repo's own docs describe as pending. The new text in README.md:618 ("Hive integrates Goose as an independent CNCF project") and src/docs/landscape.md:19-21 (same phrase) reads as a statement that Hive is a CNCF project. The canonical self-assessment says otherwise at src/docs/security-self-assessment.md:5 ("submitted as a supporting artifact of Hive Commons' CNCF Sandbox …") and :10 ("mirrored into cncf/toc … for the CNCF Sandbox application") — i.e. an application, not an accepted project. src/docs/general-technical-review.md:95 frames it differently again ("part of the KubeStellar CNCF Sandbox project family"). Removing an over-claim about AAIF by introducing an over-claim about CNCF would be a net wash for the stated goal.

Question for the maintainer: is Hive an accepted CNCF project today, or a Sandbox applicant? If the latter, "an independent open-source project" (or "a CNCF Sandbox applicant") in both places keeps the AAIF disclaimer intact without asserting CNCF status.

Everything else checked out: src/Dockerfile:283, src/Dockerfile.contributor:329, config/backends.conf:373 are comment-only; docs/backend-setup.md, docs/goose-at-scale.md keep the same aaif-goose/goose release source and pin language; the dropped aaif/aaif-landscape#22 paragraph in landscape.md matches the body's stated intent to remove listing-eligibility language. I have not changed or closed anything.

— hive: agent=reviewer backend=copilot model=claude-fable-5.1 copilot=1.0.88

[github-actions]

Open PR overlap check

Base branch: v5

Conflicts are checked with every PR merged onto the current tip of v5, so a PR that only needs a rebase is not reported as conflicting with its siblings.

PR	Title	Relation	Files
#10721	🌱 ci: build arm64 images on self-hosted via QEMU with cross-compiled Go	same files	src/Dockerfile src/Dockerfile.contributor

[github-actions]

Thank you for your contribution! Your PR has been merged.

We'd love to hear how your experience was: share feedback