Skip to content

hexo-ai/socrates

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

10 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Socrates: Structured Questioning Unlocks Latent Knowledge in AI Research Agents

License: MIT asciinema

Pair a tool-using research agent with a question-only advisor that can never give answers, never issue directives, and has no tools of its own. The advisor must approve every plan via [APPROVED] before the Scientist runs the next experiment. On five MLE-bench Kaggle competitions this lifts test scores by an average of +55.9% over the same agent running alone.

Socrates protocol

Left: Socrates asks questions only and is stateful across sessions; the Scientist is stateless, executes code, and reads/writes the shared environment. Right: Statoil example — Socrates asks whether incremental tuning is closing the gap, the Scientist pivots to domain features (+10.2%); the Baseline PI offers generic encouragement and the Scientist stays on pixel statistics (+1.6%).

Note

The asciinema badge above is a placeholder. To record your own: bash scripts/record_demo.sh, then asciinema upload and paste the returned cast ID into this README in place of YOUR_CAST_ID (two occurrences).


Table of contents


Quick start

Tested on Python 3.10–3.12, Linux/macOS. GPU is optional (only required for tasks that train deep models — Statoil and NFL benefit, the others run fine on CPU).

# 1. Clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/hexo-ai/socrates.git
cd socrates

# 2. Create an isolated environment (conda or venv — pick one)
conda create -n socrates python=3.11 -y
conda activate socrates
#   or
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate

# 3. Install dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
pip install --no-deps -r socratic-evolve/public-repo/requirements_base.txt
pip install --no-deps -r socratic-evolve/public-repo/requirements_ml.txt
pip install --no-deps -r socratic-evolve/public-repo/requirements_domain.txt

# 4. Set API keys
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="sk-ant-..."        # required
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..."               # optional, only if you use OpenAI models

# 5. Create a local test config (gitignored)
cp socratic-evolve/test_config.yaml.example socratic-evolve/test_config.yaml
cp discover/test_config.yaml.example          discover/test_config.yaml
# Edit each to set dataset_dir and model.

# 6. Smoke-test the sequential scaffold
python discover/test_agent_locally.py

If step 6 prints a Socrates question and an [APPROVED] from a short discussion loop, the install is good.


Repository layout

socrates/
├── discover/                 # Sequential scaffold (single agent, one experiment at a time)
│   ├── custom_agent.py       # Agent implementation
│   ├── base_agent.py         # Base class with webhook protocol
│   ├── models.py             # Message models
│   └── test_agent_locally.py # Local smoke test
│
├── socratic-evolve/          # Evolutionary scaffold (MLevolve + MCGS tree search)
│   ├── custom_agent.py       # Agent wrapper
│   ├── base_agent.py         # Base class
│   ├── models.py             # Message models
│   └── public-repo/          # MLevolve core
│       ├── run.py            # Main entry point for full experiments
│       ├── config/           # Default configuration
│       ├── engine/           # MCGS tree search, code execution
│       ├── agents/           # Multi-agent subsystem
│       │   ├── socrates/     # Socrates PI implementation
│       │   │   ├── prompts.py        # Question-only system prompt + [APPROVED] gate
│       │   │   ├── approval_loop.py  # Multi-round discussion loop
│       │   │   └── config.py         # Toggle flags
│       │   ├── evolution_agent.py    # Paradigm-shift mutations
│       │   └── fusion_agent.py       # Cross-branch solution merging
│       └── llm/              # LLM client wrappers
│
├── assets/
│   └── protocol.png          # Protocol diagram
├── scripts/
│   └── record_demo.sh        # Records the asciinema demo cast
├── conda.sh                  # Quick env activation helper
├── requirements.txt          # Top-level dependency manifest
├── LICENSE                   # MIT
└── README.md                 # This file

The two scaffolds

Sequential (discover/)

A single agent writes and executes experiments one at a time. No built-in exploration mechanism. The Scientist retains tool access during Socratic review, so when Socrates asks "how many features have zero importance?" the Scientist runs the analysis right then. Best when per-step quality matters more than raw experiment volume.

Evolutionary (socratic-evolve/)

An evolutionary code-generation system (MLevolve) maintaining a tree of candidate solutions across parallel branches. Includes evolution stages (paradigm-shift mutations), fusion stages (cross-branch solution merging), and runs multiple branches in parallel. During review, the Scientist can only revise plan text (no tool access). Best when the search space rewards high iteration volume.


The three conditions

All controlled via configuration flags (use_socrates_review and use_baseline_pi in config.yaml / config.py):

Condition Flags Behavior
Scientist-only use_socrates_review=False, use_baseline_pi=False Single agent, no supervision.
Baseline PI use_socrates_review=False, use_baseline_pi=True Second agent giving generic encouragement (control condition).
Socrates use_socrates_review=True Full protocol: question-only PI, [APPROVED] gate.

Reproducing the paper results

We evaluate on five tasks from MLE-bench:

Task Metric Notes
Statoil Iceberg Log Loss ↓ Radar imagery
Stanford COVID Vaccine MCRMSE ↓ RNA degradation
Ventilator Pressure MAE ↓ Tabular time-series
NFL Contact Detection MCC ↑ Player tracking + video
Smartphone Decimeter Haversine ↓ GPS positioning

1. Get the datasets

Follow the MLE-bench instructions to download the five competition datasets. Place each one under a local directory and remember its path — you'll plug it into the config in the next step.

2. Run the sequential scaffold

cd discover/
# Edit test_config.yaml to set:
#   AGENT_CONFIG.exp_id        -> the MLE-bench task id (e.g. "statoil-iceberg-classifier-challenge")
#   AGENT_CONFIG.dataset_dir   -> the local path you put the data in
#   AGENT_CONFIG.model         -> the LLM (default: claude-opus-4-6)
python test_agent_locally.py

This writes per-experiment folders, a best_score.txt, and a submission.csv in dataset_dir. Submit submission.csv to Kaggle to get the test score.

3. Run the evolutionary scaffold

cd socratic-evolve/public-repo/
python run.py \
  exp_id="statoil-iceberg-classifier-challenge" \
  agent.use_socrates_review=True \
  agent.steps=50

For each task, run it once per condition (toggling the flags above) so you can compare Scientist-only / Baseline PI / Socrates side by side.

4. Collecting and plotting

cd socratic-evolve/public-repo/
python collect_and_plot.py   # aggregates per-experiment logs into the paper's tables/plots
python dashboard.py          # optional live dashboard

Expected results

Task Scientist-only (test) Baseline PI (test) Socrates (test) Δ vs Scientist
Statoil 0.255 0.251 0.229 +10.5%
COVID 0.389 0.308 0.294 +24.4%
Ventilator 1.534 0.815 0.853 +44.4%
NFL 0.198 0.537 0.584 +195.4%
Smartphone 6.285 5.993 5.984 +4.8%

Note: LLM agents are high-variance run-to-run. We saw a standard deviation of ~15% of the mean across 10 Scientist-only seeds on Smartphone. Expect single-seed numbers to vary; the direction of the effect (Socrates ≥ Baseline PI > Scientist-only) is the reproducible claim.


Configuration reference

The key flags live in socratic-evolve/public-repo/config/config.yaml and discover/test_config.yaml:

Flag Default Meaning
agent.use_socrates_review false Enable the full Socrates question-only protocol.
agent.use_baseline_pi false Enable the generic-encouragement control condition.
agent.steps 50 (evolve) / 30 (seq) Total experiment budget.
agent.K 3 Max discussion rounds before forced approval.
agent.model claude-opus-4-6 Scientist LLM.
agent.feedback_model (same as model) Socrates LLM (can differ from the Scientist).
agent.respect_finished true Whether the agent may stop early via [FINISHED].
agent.enforce_gpu_usage false Inject the GPU-required block into the system prompt.

A more detailed flag-level reference for the prompts (which blocks get injected when) is in socratic-evolve/public-repo/agents/socrates/.


Running tests

# Sequential scaffold smoke test (no real run; mocks the LLM):
python discover/test_agent_locally.py --dry-run

# Evolutionary scaffold live test (requires API key):
cd socratic-evolve/public-repo/
pytest tests/test_socrates_live.py -k "test_socrates_basic"

Citation

@inproceedings{vrabac2026socrates,
  title     = {Socrates: Structured Questioning Unlocks Latent Knowledge in AI Research Agents},
  author    = {Vrabac, Damir and Hebbar, Prannay and Manawat, Yogendra and Palanimalai, Selvam and Verboomen, Samuel and Juneja, Gurusha and Bhatia, Kunal and Baskaran, Vignesh},
  booktitle = {Conference on Language Modeling (COLM)},
  year      = {2026}
}

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

About

A multi-agent protocol pairing a tool-using Scientist with a question-only advisor — no tools, no answers, no directives — improves Kaggle test performance on 4 of 5 MLE-bench tasks

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors