[agairola]

Project: https://github.com/raxITlabs/decision-models-as-guardrails (leaderboard: https://dm-as-guardrails.raxitlabs.com, dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/raxITLabs/decision-models-as-guardrails)

Where Jev fits: Jev 1.13.0 and 1.14.0 are two of the 19 systems scored on 9,975 labelled guardrail checks; each check goes to Jev as a typed Noul question and code blocks at a probability of 0.5 or more (benchmark/goldrails_bench/systemone.py).

• I added one object to data/projects.json and ran npm run validate
• I did not commit README.md or site/index.html (CI regenerates them)
• I am the author, or I linked where the project was announced

I work at raxIT Labs, which built and maintains the benchmark.

---

^{Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.}

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added the “Decision Models as Guardrails” research project to the projects catalog, including its description, links, category, language, star count, and date added.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 1c3e66dd-6a85-4f28-8fa8-a7ca7758b9df

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e4f338 and ba9d36c.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1

• data/projects.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

The projects catalog adds the Decision Models as Guardrails research project. Its entry includes repository and site details, a description, category, language, star count, and added date.

Changes: Project catalog entry

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add project catalog entry data/projects.json	The catalog gains an entry for raxITlabs/decision-models-as-guardrails with project metadata and a description of its guardrail comparison scope.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Feature

Suggested reviewers: scald

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ba9d3

This catalog-only change introduces no identified merge-blocking risk.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check		The description includes the required Project and Where Jev fits sections. It confirms the data file change, validation command, excluded generated files, and author or announcement requirement.
Title check		The title clearly identifies the main change: adding Decision Models as Guardrails to the benchmarks and research catalog.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}