Skip to content

A new site has its model providers, and an automation's key is made from its name - #34

Merged
adamfortuna merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
first-providers
Nov 15, 2026
Merged

adamfortuna merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
first-providers

Conversation

@adamfortuna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Setting Harbor up in a blank Rails app and making one of everything on its pages (an agent, a runtime, a workspace, an automation, a scorer, a review rule, a workflow) found two things that stopped it:

  • No model providers. Nothing made the Anthropic and OpenAI rows, so the alias form offered no provider, no alias could be made, and so no agent. The Models pages now make any that are missing, switched on. A provider that exists is left as it is.
  • An automation needed a key typed by hand ("Key can't be blank"). Saved with none, it is now given one made from its name, with a number when that is taken, as a runtime is.

0.27.1.

…rom its name

Setting Harbor up in a blank app and making one of everything on its pages
found two things that stopped it. Nothing made the Anthropic and OpenAI
provider rows, so no model alias could be made, and so no agent: the Models
pages now make any that are missing. And an automation saved with no key
was refused: it is now given one made from its name, as a runtime is
(Harbor::KeyFromName). 0.27.1.
@adamfortuna
adamfortuna merged commit e2ce878 into main Nov 15, 2026
2 checks passed
@adamfortuna
adamfortuna deleted the first-providers branch November 15, 2026 03:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant