Skip to content

chore(eslint): enable no-var and preserve-caught-error rules#1048

Open
carlosthe19916 wants to merge 4 commits into
guacsec:mainfrom
carlosthe19916:hotfix/enable-no-var-preserve-caught-error
Open

chore(eslint): enable no-var and preserve-caught-error rules#1048
carlosthe19916 wants to merge 4 commits into
guacsec:mainfrom
carlosthe19916:hotfix/enable-no-var-preserve-caught-error

Conversation

@carlosthe19916
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@carlosthe19916 carlosthe19916 commented May 27, 2026

Summary

  • Remove no-var and preserve-caught-error from the ESLint "off" overrides so default strictness applies
  • Fix varconst in e2e API tests
  • Attach cause to re-thrown error in e2e UI helper

Test plan

  • npm run lint passes with 0 warnings

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by Sourcery

Tighten ESLint configuration by enforcing modern error handling and variable declaration rules in e2e code.

Enhancements:

  • Replace var with const in e2e API tests and helpers to comply with stricter linting rules.
  • Attach the original error as a cause when rethrowing download verification failures in the e2e UI helper.
  • Remove overrides that disabled the no-var and preserve-caught-error ESLint rules so default strictness applies.

Remove the "off" overrides so the default strictness applies.
Fix var→const in e2e tests and attach cause to re-thrown error.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented May 27, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Enables stricter ESLint behavior by removing overrides that disabled no-var and preserve-caught-error, then updates affected e2e tests/helpers to use const instead of var and to preserve the original error as a cause when rethrowing.

Flow diagram for updated error rethrowing with cause in UI helper

flowchart TD
  A[Run UI download verification helper] --> B[Download verification fails]
  B --> C[catch err]
  C --> D[Create new Error with message and cause: err]
  D --> E[throw new Error]
  E --> F[Caller receives error with preserved original cause]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Enable stricter ESLint rules by removing overrides for no-var and preserve-caught-error.
  • Remove no-var rule from the list of explicit overrides set to off so the default rule configuration applies.
  • Remove preserve-caught-error rule from the list of explicit overrides set to off so the default rule configuration applies.
eslint.config.mjs
Update e2e API tests and helpers to satisfy the no-var rule by using const for local variables and arrays.
  • Replace var with const for URL-encoded purl, alias, and CPE values in analysis alias API tests.
  • Replace var with const when building full SBOM paths in the general e2e API helpers.
e2e/tests/api/features/analysis-alias.ts
e2e/tests/api/helpers/general-helpers.ts
Preserve the original error when rethrowing download verification failures in the UI helper to comply with preserve-caught-error and improve diagnostics.
  • Wrap the caught error as the cause when creating a new Error in verifyDownload so the original error is preserved and visible in error chains.
e2e/tests/ui/pages/Helpers.ts

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.70%. Comparing base (16a6bec) to head (922d4f3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1048      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   50.68%   50.70%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         253      253              
  Lines        5499     5499              
  Branches     1660     1660              
==========================================
+ Hits         2787     2788       +1     
  Misses       2440     2440              
+ Partials      272      271       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 68.96% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit 2.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@carlosthe19916 carlosthe19916 marked this pull request as draft May 27, 2026 12:14
@carlosthe19916 carlosthe19916 marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2026 14:39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • In getFullSbomPaths, consider using return sbomPaths.map(path => ${sbomDir}/${path}); instead of mutating an array with forEach to make the helper more concise and idiomatic.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In `getFullSbomPaths`, consider using `return sbomPaths.map(path => `${sbomDir}/${path}`);` instead of mutating an array with `forEach` to make the helper more concise and idiomatic.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant