[GAP-10] Add equivalent selection conflict validation rule#48
Merged
magicmark merged 1 commit intoJun 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
magicmark
force-pushed
the
gap-10-equivalent-selection-validation
branch
5 times, most recently
from
47ae3fc to
2169307
Compare
…ctions Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
magicmark
force-pushed
the
gap-10-equivalent-selection-validation
branch
from
2169307 to
121a0bf
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a validation rule requiring that equivalent selections (fields resolving to the same response position) must not have conflicting
@mockusage. If any equivalent selection uses@mock, all must use it with the same arguments.Discussed in https://discord.com/channels/625400653321076807/1507064206241956052