Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jswrenn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new unsafe trait ProjectField to facilitate invariant-respecting projections over Ptrs. The new trait is well-defined and documented. My review includes a suggestion to correct a minor inconsistency in the documentation for the project method, where the parameter name used in the comments differs from the one in the function signature. Aligning these will improve clarity, which is crucial for an unsafe trait.
7261c75 to
30859f4
Compare
bb6f84e to
c6f7382
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2886 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.90% 91.72% -0.19%
==========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 5883 5910 +27
==========================================
+ Hits 5407 5421 +14
- Misses 476 489 +13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
c6f7382 to
dc4cfc8
Compare
c37d1c9 to
105108b
Compare
dc4cfc8 to
dbdce80
Compare
4c71ea4 to
7850e9f
Compare
dbdce80 to
16c5cd9
Compare
e9aba20 to
3389089
Compare
3389089 to
0ea7f5e
Compare
9ee7b9e to
86ed3f5
Compare
86ed3f5 to
0208eba
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces the ProjectField trait, which is a significant and positive change for invariant-respecting projection over Ptrs. This refactoring allows for more granular control and safety guarantees when projecting fields, especially with fallible projections. The introduction of the into_inner! macro for infallible Result unwrapping is also a good addition.
0208eba to
7f5262d
Compare
joshlf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please resolve remaining comments before merging.
7f5262d to
c28cac9
Compare
This trait powers invariant-respecting projection over `Ptr`s. gherrit-pr-id: Gb6fa34cec5080caffa0980ed1d3e1ae273550f44
c28cac9 to
2974513
Compare
This trait powers invariant-respecting projection over
Ptrs.invariant::Validtoinvariant::Safe#2913ProjectFieldtrait #2886Latest Update: v23 — Compare vs v22
📚 Full Patch History
Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.