Skip to content

About

microzig's flags parser built two ways on the 0.17 lane: azazel (CUE model) and zaza (Zig build graph)

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

9 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

azazel-parity-microzig

microzig's flags parser (tools/flags, std-only) built two ways, to prove and compare azazel and zaza.

Both build a consumer that parses --name=zaza into a Flags struct, on Zig 0.17.0-dev.892 (microzig's toolchain family). azazel reaches it through its "0.17" lane. Neither vendors microzig's source; each stages the single tools/flags/src/root.zig file at a pinned commit.

Pinned upstream

Repository https://github.com/ZigEmbeddedGroup/microzig
Commit aabcd3e1824adac6aa3feca8023d50ee0ccbf8fc
File tools/flags/src/root.zig
Zig 0.17.0-dev.892+54537285c

Build it

cd azazel && ./fetch.sh && sh gen_build_spec.sh && zig build && ./zig-out/bin/consumer
cd zaza  && ./fetch.sh && zig build run

Both print microzig flags: name=zaza verbose=false.

Comparison

Clean-cache builds with dependencies pre-fetched, Apple Silicon, fastest of two runs.

Build Clean build Config
azazel 3.4 s project.cue — 14 lines · 429 B
zaza 3.1 s build.zig — 13 lines · 825 B

The upstream's full build is not reproduced here (see the note below), so no native time is listed.

Another tiny std-only consumer where zaza's dozen lines are smaller than the CUE; microzig's full embedded build is not reproduced here.

Build process & what can be optimized

Both build roots stage the pinned upstream with fetch.sh into a git-ignored vendor/ (a curl for single-file slices, a shallow clone for source trees) — no upstream sources are committed. Then:

  • azazel: sh gen_build_spec.sh runs CUE and emits build_spec.zig (the build declared as data), then zig build compiles it. The CUE step is memoized — it re-runs only when the model changes (~0.20s → ~0.01s otherwise).
  • zaza: zig build drives the standard Zig build graph directly.

What actually makes it faster

Measured across the corpus (clean vs warm builds):

Lever Speedup Note
Content-addressed cache (rebuild) 89× 14.2s → 0.16s; Zig has it, both inherit it
Incremental (edit one file) 10.8× 14.2s → 1.32s; deps stay cached
CI dependency cache 2× cold 13.3s → warm 6.6s; this repo's CI caches ~/.cache/zig
Memoized CUE codegen 20× azazel's only overhead, gone
Parallelism (many cores) 1.1× marginal — shared std + startup dominate
GPU none compilation is branchy, sequential, dependency-ordered

The instinct to parallelize like a C++ build doesn't transfer: Zig is one mostly-single-threaded compile per artifact with a fast self-hosted backend and a shared std that caches. For Zig, caching is the lever, not parallelism.

The real frontier is residency: a resident compile server that keeps the InternPool hot and recompiles only changed declarations, plus in-place binary patching (Zig's roadmap) and a shared content-addressed cache. azazel's build-as-data is positioned for it — the build is a query, and the cache key is computable from the pinned model without running the compiler. Full write-up and the cross-repo comparison: the corpus dashboard.

About

microzig's flags parser built two ways on the 0.17 lane: azazel (CUE model) and zaza (Zig build graph)

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages