Skip to content

[GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9] zrok: Unauthenticated DoS via unbounded memory allocation in striped session cookie parsing#7420

Closed
ryanbekhen wants to merge 1 commit into
ryanbekhen/advisory-improvement-7420from
ryanbekhen-GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9
Closed

[GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9] zrok: Unauthenticated DoS via unbounded memory allocation in striped session cookie parsing#7420
ryanbekhen wants to merge 1 commit into
ryanbekhen/advisory-improvement-7420from
ryanbekhen-GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9

Conversation

@ryanbekhen
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products
  • Description

Comments
The suggested improvements are based on the vulnerability description in GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9.
Adding an upper bound check and token validation prevents unbounded memory allocation.
Reference: GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9
Similar fixes were introduced in v2.0.1, so backporting to older versions would improve security.
Unit tests for malicious cookie input will ensure robustness against DoS attempts.

@github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

github commented Apr 17, 2026

Hi there @mikegorman-nf! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 17, 2026 03:20
@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to ryanbekhen/advisory-improvement-7420 April 17, 2026 03:22
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@shelbyc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

shelbyc commented Apr 17, 2026

Hi @ryanbekhen, because a patch already exists, a Suggested Improvements section is unnecessary. Users who want to suggest a backported fix should provide that feedback to maintainers, not to the GitHub Advisory Database. Thank you for your interest in GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9.

@shelbyc shelbyc closed this Apr 17, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot deleted the ryanbekhen-GHSA-cpf9-ph2j-ccr9 branch April 17, 2026 19:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants