[GHSA-wj64-gh9j-xm82] Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to...#7312
Closed
vdukhovni wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[GHSA-wj64-gh9j-xm82] Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to...#7312vdukhovni wants to merge 1 commit into
vdukhovni wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
changed the base branch from
main
to
vdukhovni/advisory-improvement-7312
|
Hi @vdukhovni, unfortunately, we are unable to update CVE-2026-2673 because the ID was issued by CISA-ADP. GitHub is not the assigning CNA for this CVE. To get it updated, you need to contact CISA-ADP at contact@mail.cisa.dhs.gov. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates
Comments
It makes no sense to give this CVE a HIGH rating. I barely convinced the OpenSSL security response team to assign a CVE at all. This is a deviation from documented behaviour, but there's no attack vector, other than perhaps record all the traffic, and perhaps someday decrypt, but only relevant under the multiple uncommon conditions that result in the deviation from documented behaviour.