t0213: skip ancestry tests under user-mode emulation#2168
Conversation
Welcome to GitGitGadgetHi @JamieMagee, and welcome to GitGitGadget, the GitHub App to send patch series to the Git mailing list from GitHub Pull Requests. Please make sure that either:
You can CC potential reviewers by adding a footer to the PR description with the following syntax: NOTE: DO NOT copy/paste your CC list from a previous GGG PR's description, Also, it is a good idea to review the commit messages one last time, as the Git project expects them in a quite specific form:
It is in general a good idea to await the automated test ("Checks") in this Pull Request before contributing the patches, e.g. to avoid trivial issues such as unportable code. Contributing the patchesBefore you can contribute the patches, your GitHub username needs to be added to the list of permitted users. Any already-permitted user can do that, by adding a comment to your PR of the form Both the person who commented An alternative is the channel Once on the list of permitted usernames, you can contribute the patches to the Git mailing list by adding a PR comment If you want to see what email(s) would be sent for a After you submit, GitGitGadget will respond with another comment that contains the link to the cover letter mail in the Git mailing list archive. Please make sure to monitor the discussion in that thread and to address comments and suggestions (while the comments and suggestions will be mirrored into the PR by GitGitGadget, you will still want to reply via mail). If you do not want to subscribe to the Git mailing list just to be able to respond to a mail, you can download the mbox from the Git mailing list archive (click the curl -g --user "<EMailAddress>:<Password>" \
--url "imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX" -T /path/to/raw.txtTo iterate on your change, i.e. send a revised patch or patch series, you will first want to (force-)push to the same branch. You probably also want to modify your Pull Request description (or title). It is a good idea to summarize the revision by adding something like this to the cover letter (read: by editing the first comment on the PR, i.e. the PR description): To send a new iteration, just add another PR comment with the contents: Need help?New contributors who want advice are encouraged to join git-mentoring@googlegroups.com, where volunteers who regularly contribute to Git are willing to answer newbie questions, give advice, or otherwise provide mentoring to interested contributors. You must join in order to post or view messages, but anyone can join. You may also be able to find help in real time in the developer IRC channel, |
The tests added in 3c8c638 (t0213: add trace2 cmd_ancestry tests, 2026-02-13) expect the cmd_ancestry event to name "test-tool" and "git". On Linux those names come from the "comm" field of /proc/<pid>/stat. Under user-mode emulation (e.g. qemu-user) /proc reports the emulator ("qemu-riscv64") instead, so the event is still emitted, the TRACE2_ANCESTRY probe enables the tests, and tests 2-5 fail even though they pass on native riscv64. Require the probe to see "test-tool" in the ancestry of a test-tool spawned from test-tool, so the tests skip when the names are unreliable. Cc: Matthew John Cheetham <mjcheetham@outlook.com> Signed-off-by: Jamie Magee <jamie.magee@gmail.com>
0b82bba to
a8a2438
Compare
|
/allow |
|
User JamieMagee is now allowed to use GitGitGadget. WARNING: JamieMagee has no public email address set on GitHub; GitGitGadget needs an email address to Cc: you on your contribution, so that you receive any feedback on the Git mailing list. Go to https://github.com/settings/profile to make your preferred email public to let GitGitGadget know which email address to use. |
|
/submit |
|
Submitted as pull.2168.git.1783359242130.gitgitgadget@gmail.com To fetch this version into To fetch this version to local tag |
|
Junio C Hamano wrote on the Git mailing list (how to reply to this email): "Jamie Magee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> -# Determine if cmd_ancestry is supported on this platform.
> +# Enable these tests only when cmd_ancestry reports real process names.
> +# The procinfo stub emits no event; under user-mode emulation (e.g.
> +# qemu-user) /proc reports the emulator, not the guest. Spawn test-tool
> +# from test-tool and require "test-tool" in the child's ancestry.
T.r.i.c.k.y. ;-)
> test_expect_success 'detect cmd_ancestry support' '
> test_when_finished "rm -f trace.detect" &&
> GIT_TRACE2_BRIEF=1 GIT_TRACE2="$(pwd)/trace.detect" \
> - test-tool trace2 001return 0 &&
> - if grep -q "^cmd_ancestry" trace.detect
> + test-tool trace2 004child test-tool trace2 001return 0 &&
> + if grep -q "^cmd_ancestry.*test-tool" trace.detect
This will be happy even if "test-tool-trash" that happens to have
"test-tool" as its prefix appears on a cmd_ancestry line (for that
matter, things like "cmd_ancestry-not-quite" that has "cmd_ancestry"
as its prefix would be accepted). I guess that is OK because we are
testing this in a fairly tightly controlled environment (trace keys
are taken from known vocabulary, not arbitrary strings, for example).
Will queue. Thanks.
> then
> test_set_prereq TRACE2_ANCESTRY
> fi
>
> base-commit: e9019fcafe0040228b8631c30f97ae1adb61bcdc |
|
This branch is now known as |
|
This patch series was integrated into seen via git@143cc11. |
No description provided.