Repository navigation
Add package routes for private Composer and npm registries #426
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
andrew
merged 5 commits into
git-pkgs:main
from
simonchrz:feature/private-package-routes
Oct 11, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
56175aa
Add Composer package routes for private repositories
simonchrz 9e4c4f9
Add npm package routes for private registries
simonchrz f86b33f
Share routed artifact filename qualification between handlers
simonchrz fef12ac
Match Composer routes without the ~dev suffix
simonchrz 8553245
Keep routed npm publish times out of the shared versions row
simonchrz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An exact route for
example/librarydoes not match/p2/example/library~dev.json, becausepackageNamestill contains~dev. This sends the private package's development metadata request to the default public registry. A handler-level reproduction returned public metadata without contacting the private registry. Strip~devfor route matching while preserving it in the upstream URL and cache key, and add a regression test for an exact package route.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, confirmed. Fixed in fef12ac:
sourceFornow matches routes against the package name without~dev, and keeps the suffix in the upstream URL and the cache key, so the stable and dev files stay apart.TestComposerExactRouteCoversDevMetadatauses an exact route forexample/libraryand requests/p2/example/library~dev.json. Before the fix it got the public document without contacting the route. Now only the route is queried and the dev versions are rewritten through the proxy. The route docs mention the~devfile too.