Skip to content

chore(deps): bump ctutils to 0.4.5 (RUSTSEC-2026-0385) - #302

Closed
tonibergholm-codento wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore-bump-ctutils
Closed

tonibergholm-codento wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore-bump-ctutils

Conversation

@tonibergholm-codento

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

 [[package]]
 name = "ctutils"
-version = "0.4.2"
+version = "0.4.5"

ctutils is pulled in by digest 0.11 (through ed25519-dalek in scl-crypto). RUSTSEC-2026-0385 (published today): Choice mask generation and u128 comparisons could compile to branches, patched in 0.4.4. Lock-only; no source change.

Evidence

Merge Danger

Door: two-way.

Blast Radius: one crypto-adjacent transitive dependency used for constant-time operations; patch-level bump of a crate the advisory says is fixed.

Non-constant-time mask generation in ctutils::Choice, fixed in 0.4.4. Transitive through
digest 0.11 (ed25519-dalek in scl-crypto); a lock-only update, no source changes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters: 1
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 62464a37-1115-4681-9008-e848595435bf

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review 🔄 Running since 2026-10-23T09:01:20.210286Z 1fc649c PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-23T09:03:16.695730Z 1fc649c PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@tonibergholm-codento

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Superseded: the identical ctutils 0.4.5 lock change landed in #301 (3571fb8), so main already has it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant